Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34964149›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2022

Acute response to cholinergic challenge predicts long-term response to galantamine treatment in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Anne Catrien Baakman, Carmen Gavan, Lotte van Doeselaar, Marieke de Kam, Karen Broekhuizen, Ovidiu Bajenaru, Laura Camps, Eleonora L Swart, Kees Kalisvaart, Niki Schoonenboom and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne Catrien BaakmanCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Carmen GavanClinicii de neurologie a Spitalului Universitar de Urgenta, Bucharest, Romania.
Lotte van DoeselaarCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marieke de KamCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Karen BroekhuizenCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ovidiu BajenaruClinicii de neurologie a Spitalului Universitar de Urgenta, Bucharest, Romania.
Laura CampsCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eleonora L SwartDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kees KalisvaartDepartment of Neurology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
Niki SchoonenboomDepartment of Neurology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
Evelien LemstraAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Philip ScheltensAlzheimer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Adam CohenCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Joop van GervenCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1444-7415
Geert Jan GroeneveldCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4655-6667
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLSpaarne Gasthuis · NLSpitalul Universitar de Urgență Elias · ROLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCholinesterase inhibitors (CEIs) have been shown to improve cognitive functioning in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients, but are associated with multiple side effects and only 20-40% of the patients clinically improve. In this study, we aimed to investigate the acute pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of administration of a single dose of galantamine on central nervous system (CNS) functioning in mild to moderate AD patients and its potential to predict long-term treatment response.

methodsThis study consisted of a challenge and treatment phase. In the challenge phase, a single dose of 16 mg galantamine was administered to 50 mild to moderate AD patients in a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over fashion. Acute PD effects were monitored up to 5 hours after administration with use of the NeuroCart CNS test battery and safety and pharmacokinetics were assessed. In the treatment phase, patients were treated with open-label galantamine according to regular clinical care. After 6 months of galantamine treatment, patients were categorized as either responder or as non-responder based on their minimental state examination (MMSE), neuropsychiatric inventory (NPI) and disability assessment in dementia (DAD) scores. An analysis of covariance was performed to study the difference in acute PD effects during the challenge phase between responders and non-responders.

resultsA single dose of galantamine significantly reduced saccadic reaction time (-0.0099; 95% CI = -0.0195, -0.0003; P = .0430), absolute frontal EEG parameters in alpha (-14.9; 95% CI = -21.0, -8.3; P = .0002), beta (-12.6; 95% CI = -19.4, -5.3; P = .0019) and theta (-17.9; 95% CI = -25.0, -10.0; P = .0001) frequencies. Relative frontal (-1.669; 95% CI = -2.999, -0.339; P = .0156) and occipital (-1.856; 95% CI = -3.339, -0.372; P = .0166) EEG power in theta frequency and relative occipital EEG power in the gamma frequency (1.316; 95% CI = 0.158, 2.475; P = .0273) also increased significantly compared to placebo. Acute decreases of absolute frontal alpha (-20.4; 95% CI = -31.6, -7.47; P = .0046), beta (-15.7; 95% CI = -28.3, -0.93; P = .0390) and theta (-25.9; 95% CI = -38.4, -10.9; P = .0024) EEG parameters and of relative frontal theta power (-3.27%; 95% CI = -5.96, -0.58; P = .0187) on EEG significantly distinguished responders (n = 11) from non-responders (n = 32) after 6 months.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that acute PD effects after single dose of galantamine are correlated with long-term treatment effects and that patients who demonstrate a reduction in EEG power in the alpha and theta frequency after a single administration of galantamine 16 mg will most likely respond to treatment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseNootropic AgentsCholinesterase InhibitorsCognitionGalantamineHumansTreatment OutcomeCholinesterase InhibitorsGalantamineNootropic AgentsAlzheimer's diseasecholinergic challengegalantaminepharmacology

Identifiers

PMID34964149
PMCPMC9306507
OpenAlexW4200147780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.