ArticleCureus2021
An Evaluation of Firearm Injuries in the Emergency Department.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Firearm injuries are a significant cause of mortality and morbidity. Our study aims to evaluate the injury patterns, results of imaging studies, treatment methods, outcomes, and mortality rates of patients who were admitted to the emergency department with firearm injuries. Methods Our study was designed as a retrospective descriptive study. To this end, adult patients who were admitted to our hospital with gunshot wounds between January 1, 2017, and July 31, 2021, were screened. The files of 527 patients who were admitted with gunshot wounds were analyzed. A total of 30 patients were excluded from the study due to missing data. Statistical analyses were performed using the data of a total of 497 patients. Independent variables of the study included sex, age, systolic blood pressure (SBD), diastolic blood pressure (DBD), pulse, respiratory rate, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, range of shot, injury site, X-ray, cranial CT, thorax CT, abdominal CT, and extremity CT angiography findings, and the need for treatment and referral. Mortality was the dependent variable of the study. A logistic regression model was created to predict factors affecting the survival of the patients who were admitted to the emergency department with gunshot wounds and to identify the independent variables affecting survival. A p-value of <0.05 was considered sufficient for significance. Results The majority of patients who were admitted to the emergency department due to gunshot wounds were male and the median age of the patients was 32 years (18-70 years). The comparison of the descriptive characteristics with respect to survival revealed that the systolic and diastolic blood pressures and GCS scores of the deceased patients were significantly lower than those of the survivors. The rate of shooting at short range was significantly higher in the deceased patients when compared to that of the survivors. In addition, the rate of the need for surgical intervention and the incidence of pneumocephaly in cranial CT were higher in the deceased patients than in the survivors. Significantly higher rates of deceased patients required referral to neurosurgery and thoracic surgery clinics than survivors. The patients who were referred to the thoracic surgery clinic had an increased death rate by 29-fold and the patients who were referred to the thoracic surgery clinic had an increased death rate by about nine-fold. On the other hand, the probability of death was reduced by about half when the GCS scores of the patients were higher. Discussion We evaluated GCS in our patient group and determined a significantly lower score in the patients who did not survive, which agrees with the findings of other studies. Patients with higher SBD and DBD showed a higher probability of survival, which agrees with the results in other studies. Most patients were shot from their extremities and none had died while the death rate was significantly higher in the patients who suffered injuries to the head or neck. The patients with pneumocephalus had a very low chance of survival. Compared to wound care and dressing, patients who received surgical treatment were more likely to die as these patients had more critical injuries. Conclusion Although most injuries were to the extremities, there were no mortalities in the cohort of patients referred to orthopedics. The patients who suffered injuries to the head/neck had the highest mortality rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.