Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34963721›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2021

Comparative Assessment of the Effects of Two Methods of Pressure Support Adjustment on Respiratory Distress in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation Admitted to Intensive Care Units.

Pooneh Barati, Somayeh Ghafari, Mahmood Saghaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pooneh BaratiCritical Care Nursing, Nursingand Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, IsfahanUniversity of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-0501
Somayeh GhafariNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9331-0902
Mahmood SaghaeiDepartment of Anesthesia, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran. Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8766-8139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncorrect adjustment of the respiratory parameters of the mechanical ventilator increases respiratory distress and work of breathing (WOB) in mechanically ventilated patients. The accurate adjustment of pressure support increases thepatient's comfort and decreases respiratory distress and WOB, etc.; thus, the present study was conducted to compare the effects of two pressure support adjustment methods on respiratory distress in patients under mechanical ventilation to investigate whether the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI)method can reduce patients' respiratory distress more and faster than the tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate (RR) methods. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe study was conducted in 2020 on 56 mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory distress. The patients' respiratory distress was first measured using RSBI and the respiratory distress observation scale (RDOS). The pressuresupport was then adjusted in the patients according to the RSBI (in the trial group,

resultsThe results showed no significant differences between the two groups in the mean RSBI and RDOS before (

conclusionThese two methods finally reduced the patients' respiratory distress almost equally, but RSBI method can relieve the patients' respiratory distress faster than the VT and RR methods. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Barati P, Ghafari S, Saghaei M. Comparative Assessment of the Effects of Two Methods of Pressure Support Adjustment on Respiratory Distress in Patients under Mechanical Ventilation Admitted to Intensive Care Units. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(9):1026-1030. KEY MESSAGE: VT, RR, and RSBI methods finally reduced the patients' respiratory distress almost equally, but RSBI method can relieve the patients' respiratory distress faster than the VT and RR methods.

Indexed as

Intensive care unitMechanical ventilationPressure supportRespiratory distress

Identifiers

PMID34963721
PMCPMC8664038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.