Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34963694›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2022

ERBB2 amplification status in 67 salivary duct carcinomas assessed by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and targeted exome sequencing.

Donna C Ferguson, Amir Momeni Boroujeni, Tao Zheng, Abhinita S Mohanty, Alan L Ho, Maria E Arcila, Dara S Ross, Snjezana Dogan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. HER2-low and HER2-ultra-low salivary gland carcinomas: an exploratory study.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donna C Ferguson *Departments of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Amir Momeni Boroujeni *Departments of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7714-370X
Tao ZhengDepartments of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Abhinita S MohantyDepartments of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Alan L HoDepartments of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Maria E ArcilaDepartments of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Dara S RossDepartments of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Snjezana DoganDepartments of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA. dogans@mskcc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4905-8946
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is an aggressive salivary gland malignancy with poor survival. Approximately 30% SDC harbor HER2 amplification and response to trastuzumab has been reported. However, a systematic approach for HER2 status assessment in this tumor type has not been established. A total of 67 tumor samples were evaluated for HER2 protein overexpression or ERBB2 gene amplification using at least 2 methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and/or targeted exome next-generation sequencing (NGS). NGS assessed ERBB2 copy number fold change (FC) and total copy number (TCN). HER2 status was first determined by IHC/FISH according to the 2018 ASCO/CAP breast cancer guidelines. FISH results, the "gold standard", were compared with the NGS results. All (15/15) IHC positive, 35% (6/17) equivocal, and no (0/19) IHC negative SDC were HER2 amplified by FISH. HER2 FISH signal/cell showed a good correlation with FC (Spearman correlation: 0.708, R

Indexed as

Carcinoma, DuctalSalivary Gland NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesExomeGene AmplificationHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceSalivary DuctsBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID34963694
PMCPMC10363285
OpenAlexW4200071239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.