Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34963476›Full record

ArticleFungal biology and biotechnology2021

Filamentous fungal applications in biotechnology: a combined bibliometric and patentometric assessment.

Pamina Füting, Lars Barthel, Timothy C Cairns, Heiko Briesen, Stefan Schmideder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biopriming withAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Gapless near Telomer-to-Telomer Assembly ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Keratinolytic Properties ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pamina FütingChair of Process Systems Engineering, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, 85354, Freising, Germany.
Lars BarthelChair of Applied and Molecular Microbiology, Faculty III Process Sciences, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8951-5614
Timothy C CairnsChair of Applied and Molecular Microbiology, Faculty III Process Sciences, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7106-224X
Heiko BriesenChair of Process Systems Engineering, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, 85354, Freising, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7725-5907
Stefan SchmidederChair of Process Systems Engineering, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, 85354, Freising, Germany. stefan.schmideder@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4328-9724

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 315305620Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 315384307Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 427889137Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 431657715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProcesses and products employing filamentous fungi are increasing contributors to biotechnology. These organisms are used as cell factories for the synthesis of platform chemicals, enzymes, acids, foodstuffs and therapeutics. More recent applications include processing biomass into construction or textile materials. These exciting advances raise several interrelated questions regarding the contributions of filamentous fungi to biotechnology. For example, are advances in this discipline a major contributor compared to other organisms, e.g. plants or bacteria? From a geographical perspective, where is this work conducted? Which species are predominantly used? How do biotech companies actually use these organisms?

resultsTo glean a snapshot of the state of the discipline, literature (bibliometry) and patent (patentometry) outputs of filamentous fungal applications and the related fields were quantitatively surveyed. How these outputs vary across fungal species, industrial application(s), geographical locations and biotechnological companies were analysed. Results identified (i) fungi as crucial drivers for publications and patents in biotechnology, (ii) enzyme and organic acid production as the main applications, (iii) Aspergillus as the most commonly used genus by biotechnologists, (iv) China, the United States, Brazil, and Europe as the leaders in filamentous fungal science, and (v) the key players in industrial biotechnology.

conclusionsThis study generated a summary of the status of filamentous fungal applications in biotechnology. Both bibliometric and patentometric data have identified several key trends, breakthroughs and challenges faced by the fungal research community. The analysis suggests that the future is bright for filamentous fungal research worldwide.

Indexed as

AspergillusBiofuelCitric acidEnzymeFilamentous fungiGlucoamylaseIntellectual propertyOrganic acidPenicillinTrichodermaWastewater

Identifiers

PMID34963476
PMCPMC8713403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.