Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34963468›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2021

Urine proteomics identifies biomarkers for diabetic kidney disease at different stages.

Guanjie Fan, Tongqing Gong, Yuping Lin, Jianping Wang, Lu Sun, Hua Wei, Xing Yang, Zhenjie Liu, Xinliang Li, Ling Zhao and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Guanjie Fan *The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China. 13925119990@139.com.
Tongqing Gong *Beijing Pineal Health Management Co., Ltd, Beijing, 102206, China.
Yuping Lin *The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Jianping Wang *State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, National Center for Protein Sciences, Beijing Proteome Research Center, Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China.
Lu SunThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Hua WeiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Xing YangBeijing Pineal Health Management Co., Ltd, Beijing, 102206, China.
Zhenjie LiuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Xinliang LiBeijing Pineal Health Management Co., Ltd, Beijing, 102206, China.
Ling ZhaoThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Lan SongState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, National Center for Protein Sciences, Beijing Proteome Research Center, Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China.
Jiali HeThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Haibo LiuBeijing Pineal Health Management Co., Ltd, Beijing, 102206, China.
Xiuming LiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Lifeng LiuBeijing Pineal Health Management Co., Ltd, Beijing, 102206, China.
Anxiang LiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Qiyun LuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Dongyin ZouThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Jianxuan WenThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Yaqing XiaThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Liyan WuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Haoyue HuangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Yuan ZhangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Wenwen XieThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Jinzhu HuangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Lulu LuoThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Lulu WuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Liu HeThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Qingshun LiangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Qubo ChenThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Guowei ChenThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Mingze BaiState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, National Center for Protein Sciences, Beijing Proteome Research Center, Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China.
Jun QinState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, National Center for Protein Sciences, Beijing Proteome Research Center, Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China.
Xiaotian NiState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, National Center for Protein Sciences, Beijing Proteome Research Center, Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China. xiaotianni@sgtianmu.com.
Xianyu TangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China. 13922212818@139.com.
Yi WangState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, National Center for Protein Sciences, Beijing Proteome Research Center, Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China. 18210912568@163.com.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFA0505102National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFC0908404National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFA0507503State Key Laboratory of Proteomics SKLP-K201705Zhejiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Administration 2018DB03Zhejiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Administration YN2021DB02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundType 2 diabetic kidney disease is the most common cause of chronic kidney diseases (CKD) and end-stage renal diseases (ESRD). Although kidney biopsy is considered as the 'gold standard' for diabetic kidney disease (DKD) diagnosis, it is an invasive procedure, and the diagnosis can be influenced by sampling bias and personal judgement. It is desirable to establish a non-invasive procedure that can complement kidney biopsy in diagnosis and tracking the DKD progress.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we collected 252 urine samples, including 134 uncomplicated diabetes, 65 DKD, 40 CKD without diabetes and 13 follow-up diabetic samples, and analyzed the urine proteomes with liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). We built logistic regression models to distinguish uncomplicated diabetes, DKD and other CKDs.

resultsWe quantified 559 ± 202 gene products (GPs) (Mean ± SD) on a single sample and 2946 GPs in total. Based on logistic regression models, DKD patients could be differentiated from the uncomplicated diabetic patients with 2 urinary proteins (AUC = 0.928), and the stage 3 (DKD3) and stage 4 (DKD4) DKD patients with 3 urinary proteins (AUC = 0.949). These results were validated in an independent dataset. Finally, a 4-protein classifier identified putative pre-DKD3 patients, who showed DKD3 proteomic features but were not diagnosed by clinical standards. Follow-up studies on 11 patients indicated that 2 putative pre-DKD patients have progressed to DKD3.

conclusionsOur study demonstrated the potential for urinary proteomics as a noninvasive method for DKD diagnosis and identifying high-risk patients for progression monitoring.

Indexed as

DKDProgression monitoringProteomicsUrine

Identifiers

PMID34963468
PMCPMC8903606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.