Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34963426›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2022

Thoughts and experiences on leg amputation among patients with diabetic foot ulcers.

Marie Kragh Nielsen, Heidi Bergenholtz, Ulla Riis Madsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Beyond the wound: A scoping review of the psychosocial impact of diabetes-related foot ulcers.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring nurses' experiences in pressure sore care in long-term care facilities.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marie Kragh NielsenCand Scient San., Ortopedic Department, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Heidi BergenholtzSurgical Department Holbaek Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5409-0019
Ulla Riis MadsenOrtopedic Department, Holbaek Hospital, Denmark, Holbæk, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9436-6887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough leg amputation is common among patients with diabetic foot ulcers, only few studies have examined the thoughts regarding leg amputation from the perspective of patients.

aimThis study aims to explore the thoughts of patients with diabetic foot ulcers regarding leg amputation.

methodA qualitative design using semi-structured interviews were used and analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). In all five patients participated and the interview questions were focused on thoughts in relation to a possible leg amputation.

findingsFour significant themes were revealed: 1) "Considered-not spoken"-reflections on being alone with one's thoughts, 2) "What people think about me"-concerns about consequences on social relations, 3) "The tough ones and the ones who whine"-considerations about expected self-efficacy and 4) "Limitations and opportunities"-thoughts about physical consequences.

conclusionEven if an amputation is not yet planned, having a diabetic foot ulcer can result in divergent thoughts regarding leg amputation. The findings indicate that amputation is considered a taboo which makes it difficult for the patient to talk about it within either the health care context or with relatives. Health care professionals should therefore be aware of how they communicate regarding leg amputation.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootAmputation, SurgicalHumansLegLower limb amputationpatient perspectiveperceived self-efficacypsycho-social consequencestaboo

Identifiers

PMID34963426
PMCPMC8740616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.