Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34963358›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2023

Promoting Disposal of Left-Over Opioids After Surgery in Rural Communities: A Qualitative Description Study.

Lyen C Huang, Jordan E Johnson, Josh Bleicher, Allison N Blumling, Mark Savarise, David W Wetter, Jessica N Cohan, Alex A S Harris, Kimberly A Kaphingst

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Patient Willingness to Dispose of Leftover Opioids After Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lyen C HuangThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8605-2631
Jordan E JohnsonThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Josh BleicherThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6137-4426
Allison N BlumlingThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Mark SavariseThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
David W WetterThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Jessica N CohanThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Alex A S HarrisStanford University, CA, USA.
Kimberly A KaphingstThe University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
University of Utah · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Vascular Health and Risk Factors in Children with Down SyndromeKL2TR002539 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MURTAUGH, MAUREEN A, NYGAARD, INGRID E · 2018 to 2022
$4.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002539NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients rarely dispose of left-over opioids after surgery. Disposal serves as a primary prevention against misuse, overdose, and diversion. However, current interventions promoting disposal have mixed efficacy. Increasing disposal in rural communities could prevent or reduce the harms caused by prescription opioids.

aimsIdentify barriers and facilitators to disposal in the rural communities of the United States Mountain West region.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative description study with 30 participants from Arizona, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming. We used a phronetic iterative approach combining inductive content and thematic analysis with deductive interpretation through the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM).

resultsWe identified four broad themes: (a) awareness, engagement, and education; (b) low perceived risk associated with nondisposal; (c) deciding to keep left-over opioids for future use; and (d) converting decisions into action. Most participants were aware of the importance of disposal but perceived the risks of nondisposal as low. Participants kept opioids for future use due to uncertainty about their recovery and future treatments, breakdowns in the patient-provider relationship, chronic illness or pain, or potential future injury. The rural context, particularly convenience, cost, and environmental contamination, contributes to decisional burden.

conclusionsWe identified PAPM stage-specific barriers to disposal of left-over opioids. Future interventions should account for where patients are along the spectrum of deciding to dispose or not dispose as well as promoting harm-reduction strategies for those who choose not to dispose.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug OverdoseArizonaHumansQualitative ResearchRural PopulationUnited StatesAnalgesics, Opioidbehavior changeopioidsqualitativeruralsurgery

Identifiers

PMID34963358
PMCPMC10473843
OpenAlexW4200152246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.