Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34963141›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

Strategies for building robust prediction models using data unavailable at prediction time.

Haoyu Yang, Roshan Tourani, Ying Zhu, Vipin Kumar, Genevieve B Melton, Michael Steinbach, Gyorgy Simon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Automatic Building Extraction on Satellite Images Using Unet and ResNet50.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Predictive models: important problems and innovative methods.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haoyu YangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Roshan TouraniInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Ying ZhuInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Vipin KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Genevieve B MeltonInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5193-1663
Michael SteinbachDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Gyorgy SimonInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Innovative Methods for Real-time Risk Modeling of Postoperative ComplicationsR01GM120079 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SIMON, GYORGY · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
Leveraging Advanced Informatics to Automate Data Collection of Healthcare Associated Infections (HAI) and Other Surgical Performance MeasuresR01HS024532 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WICK, ELIZABETH C · 2016 to 2019
$1.9M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024532NCATS NIH HHS CTSA UL1 TR002494NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and prolonged hospital length of stay. Risk prediction models based on pre- and intraoperative data have been proposed to assess the risk of HAIs at the end of the surgery, but the performance of these models lag behind HAI detection models based on postoperative data. Postoperative data are more predictive than pre- or interoperative data since it is closer to the outcomes in time, but it is unavailable when the risk models are applied (end of surgery). The objective is to study whether such data, which is temporally unavailable at prediction time (TUP) (and thus cannot directly enter the model), can be used to improve the performance of the risk model. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn extensive array of 12 methods based on logistic/linear regression and deep learning were used to incorporate the TUP data using a variety of intermediate representations of the data. Due to the hierarchical structure of different HAI outcomes, a comparison of single and multi-task learning frameworks is also presented. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The use of TUP data was always advantageous as baseline methods, which cannot utilize TUP data, never achieved the top performance. The relative performances of the different models vary across the different outcomes. Regarding the intermediate representation, we found that its complexity was key and that incorporating label information was helpful.

conclusionsUsing TUP data significantly helped predictive performance irrespective of the model complexity.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionHospitalsHumansLogistic ModelsMorbidityartificial intelligencehospital-acquired infectionmachine learningpredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID34963141
PMCPMC8714287
OpenAlexW4200244351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.