Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34963138›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2022

The Saline Infusion Test for Primary Aldosteronism: Implications of Immunoassay Inaccuracy.

Graeme Eisenhofer, Max Kurlbaum, Mirko Peitzsch, Georgiana Constantinescu, Hanna Remde, Manuel Schulze, Denise Kaden, Lisa Marie Müller, Carmina T Fuss, Sonja Kunz and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Is It Time to Retire Aldosterone Suppression Testing?American journal of hypertension · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Characterizing the Origins of Primary Aldosteronism.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Graeme EisenhoferDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8601-9903
Max KurlbaumDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Mirko PeitzschInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2472-675X
Georgiana ConstantinescuDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7304-2557
Hanna RemdeDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Manuel SchulzeCenter for Information Services and High Performance Computing, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Denise KadenInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Lisa Marie MüllerDepartment of Medicine IV, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Carmina T FussDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Sonja KunzDepartment of Medicine IV, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sylwia Kołodziejczyk-KrukDepartment of Hypertension, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Sven GruberDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Zurich (USZ) and University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland.
Aleksander PrejbiszDepartment of Hypertension, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Felix BeuschleinDepartment of Medicine IV, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7826-3984
Tracy Ann WilliamsDepartment of Medicine IV, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2388-6444
Martin ReinckeDepartment of Medicine IV, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9817-9875
Jacques W M LendersDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Martin BidlingmaierDepartment of Medicine IV, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4681-6668
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DEInstitute of Cardiology · PLUniversity of Zurich · CHRadboud University Nijmegen · NLTechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 314061271-TRR/CRC 205-1/2Else Kröner-Fresenius Stiftung 2019_A104European Research Council 694913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextDiagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) for many patients depends on positive results for the saline infusion test (SIT). Plasma aldosterone is often measured by immunoassays, which can return inaccurate results.

objectiveThis study aimed to establish whether differences in aldosterone measurements by immunoassay versus mass spectrometry (MS) might impact confirmatory testing for PA.

methodsThis study, involving 240 patients tested using the SIT at 5 tertiary care centers, assessed discordance between immunoassay and MS-based measurements of plasma aldosterone.

resultsPlasma aldosterone measured by Liaison and iSYS immunoassays were respectively 86% and 58% higher than determined by MS. With an immunoassay-based SIT cutoff for aldosterone of 170 pmol/L, 78 and 162 patients had, respectivel, negative and positive results. All former patients had MS-based measurements of aldosterone < 117 pmol/L, below MS-based cutoffs of 162 pmol/L. Among the 162 patients with pathogenic SIT results, MS returned nonpathologic results in 62, including 32 under 117 pmol/L. Repeat measurements by an independent MS method confirmed nonpathogenic results in 53 patients with discordant results. Patients with discordant results showed a higher (P < 0.0001) prevalence of nonlateralized than lateralized adrenal aldosterone production than patients with concordant results (83% vs 28%). Among patients with nonlateralized aldosterone production, 66% had discordant results. Discordance was more prevalent for the Liaison than iSYS immunoassay (32% vs 16%; P = 0.0065) and was eliminated by plasma purification to remove interferents.

conclusionThese findings raise concerns about the validity of immunoassay-based diagnosis of PA in over 60% of patients with presumed bilateral disease. We provide a simple solution to minimize immunoassay inaccuracy-associated misdiagnosis of PA.

Indexed as

AldosteroneHyperaldosteronismHumansImmunoassayMass SpectrometryReninSaline SolutionAldosteroneReninSaline Solutionadrenal cortexaldosteronediagnosisinterferencemass spectrometryrenin

Identifiers

PMID34963138
PMCPMC9016451
OpenAlexW4200345998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.