Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34962970›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2021

Longitudinal dynamics of SARS-CoV-2-specific cellular and humoral immunity after natural infection or BNT162b2 vaccination.

Patricia Almendro-Vázquez, Rocio Laguna-Goya, Maria Ruiz-Ruigomez, Alberto Utrero-Rico, Antonio Lalueza, Guillermo Maestro de la Calle, Pilar Delgado, Luis Perez-Ordoño, Eva Muro, Juan Vila and 12 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia Almendro-VázquezInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Rocio Laguna-GoyaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4265-8567
Maria Ruiz-RuigomezInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1538-3043
Alberto Utrero-RicoInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8814-8410
Antonio LaluezaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2711-3817
Guillermo Maestro de la CalleInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7317-5157
Pilar DelgadoCentro de Biologia Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8431-8002
Luis Perez-OrdoñoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Eva MuroDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Juan VilaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Isabel ZamarronDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Moreno-BataneroInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Marta Chivite-LacabaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9357-5556
Francisco Javier Gil-EtayoInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6152-0080
Carmen Martín-HigueraInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
María Ángeles Meléndez-CarmonaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Carlos LumbrerasInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Irene ArellanoCentro de Biologia Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Balbino AlarconCentro de Biologia Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Miguel AllendeInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Jose Maria AguadoInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9520-8255
Estela Paz-ArtalInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The timing of the development of specific adaptive immunity after natural SARS-CoV-2 infection, and its relevance in clinical outcome, has not been characterized in depth. Description of the long-term maintenance of both cellular and humoral responses elicited by real-world anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is still scarce. Here we aimed to understand the development of optimal protective responses after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. We performed an early, longitudinal study of S1-, M- and N-specific IFN-γ and IL-2 T cell immunity and anti-S total and neutralizing antibodies in 88 mild, moderate or severe acute COVID-19 patients. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2-specific adaptive immunity was also analysed in 234 COVID-19 recovered subjects, 28 uninfected BNT162b2-vaccinees and 30 uninfected healthy controls. Upon natural infection, cellular and humoral responses were early and coordinated in mild patients, while weak and inconsistent in severe patients. The S1-specific cellular response measured at hospital arrival was an independent predictive factor against severity. In COVID-19 recovered patients, four to seven months post-infection, cellular immunity was maintained but antibodies and neutralization capacity declined. Finally, a robust Th1-driven immune response was developed in uninfected BNT162b2-vaccinees. Three months post-vaccination, the cellular response was comparable, while the humoral response was consistently stronger, to that measured in COVID-19 recovered patients. Thus, measurement of both humoral and cellular responses provides information on prognosis and protection from infection, which may add value for individual and public health recommendations.

Indexed as

VaccinationAdultAgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19FemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusT-LymphocytesAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID34962970
PMCPMC8757952
OpenAlexW4200129061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.