Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34962919›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Combination treatment optimization using a pan-cancer pathway model.

Robin Schmucker, Gabriele Farina, James Faeder, Fabian Fröhlich, Ali Sinan Saglam, Tuomas Sandholm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robin SchmuckerMachine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5275-3608
Gabriele FarinaComputer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3976-0061
James FaederDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8127-609X
Fabian FröhlichDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ali Sinan SaglamDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6513-8401
Tuomas SandholmComputer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Carnegie Mellon University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USHarvard University · US

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FAEDER, JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
Systems Pharmacology of Therapeutic and Adverse Responses to ImmuneCheckpoint and Small Molecule DrugsU54CA225088 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SORGER, PETER KARL · 2018 to 2022
$10.8M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA225088NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design of efficient combination therapies is a difficult key challenge in the treatment of complex diseases such as cancers. The large heterogeneity of cancers and the large number of available drugs renders exhaustive in vivo or even in vitro investigation of possible treatments impractical. In recent years, sophisticated mechanistic, ordinary differential equation-based pathways models that can predict treatment responses at a molecular level have been developed. However, surprisingly little effort has been put into leveraging these models to find novel therapies. In this paper we use for the first time, to our knowledge, a large-scale state-of-the-art pan-cancer signaling pathway model to identify candidates for novel combination therapies to treat individual cancer cell lines from various tissues (e.g., minimizing proliferation while keeping dosage low to avoid adverse side effects) and populations of heterogeneous cancer cell lines (e.g., minimizing the maximum or average proliferation across the cell lines while keeping dosage low). We also show how our method can be used to optimize the drug combinations used in sequential treatment plans-that is, optimized sequences of potentially different drug combinations-providing additional benefits. In order to solve the treatment optimization problems, we combine the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) algorithm with a significantly more scalable sampling scheme for truncated Gaussian distributions, based on a Hamiltonian Monte-Carlo method. These optimization techniques are independent of the signaling pathway model, and can thus be adapted to find treatment candidates for other complex diseases than cancers as well, as long as a suitable predictive model is available.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsCell ProliferationComputational BiologyDecision Making, Computer-AssistedHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID34962919
PMCPMC8747684
OpenAlexW4225648581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.