Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34962789›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2022

Atomic Polarizabilities for Interactive Dipole Induction Models.

Jacob M Litman, Chengwen Liu, Pengyu Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Electric charge and salting in/out effects on glucagon's dipole moments and polarizabilities using the GruPol database.Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A Fast, Convenient, Polarizable Electrostatic Model for Molecular Dynamics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  5. Development of AMOEBA Polarizable Force Field for Rare-Earth LaThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacob M LitmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.
Chengwen LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3930-7793
Pengyu RenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5613-1910

Funding

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEXT-GENERATION NUCLEIC ACID FORCE FIELDR01GM106137 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JAY PONDER, Pengyu Ren · 2013 to 2026
$3.5M
Specificity and Selectivity in Protein-Ion BindingR01GM114237 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PONDER, JAY, REN, PENGYU · 2015 to 2023
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106137NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thole-style mutual induction models for molecular polarization have been adopted by several popular polarizable force fields (FFs) for their simplicity and transferability. The atomic polarizability parameters of these models are typically derived by fitting to

Indexed as

ElectronsMolecular Dynamics SimulationStatic Electricity

Identifiers

PMID34962789
PMCPMC8791008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.