ReviewRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina)2021
[Current characteristics of methods for determining cardiac troponins and their diagnostic value: a mini-review]
Review in Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synergistic action sandwich-type aptasensor based on nanozymes and biological enzymes for ultrasensitive cardiac troponin I determination.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Article
- Clinical Laboratory Validation Study of a High Sensitivity Troponin I Assay on a POCT (Point of Care Testing) Device.Global heart · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Role and Methods of Detection of Cardiac Troponins: An Opinion from Historical and Current Points of View.Current cardiology reviews · 2023Review
- Features of the Metabolisms of Cardiac Troponin Molecules-Part 1: The Main Stages of Metabolism, Release Stage.Current issues in molecular biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The expansion and discovery of new diagnostic possibilities for the use of many biomarkers of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), including cardiospecific troponin isoforms (cTnI, cTnT), is due to improved laboratory methods for their determination. Throughout a long history of the creation and improvement of immunochemical methods for the determination of cTnI and cTnT, significant changes were observed in the concept of biology and its diagnostic value as CVD biomarkers. The obsolete methods of detection of cTnI, cTnT, named low sensitivity and moderate, were distinguished by a relatively low sensitivity, which led to the confirmation late in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and, therefore, such methods were gradually replaced by new methods of high and moderate sensitivity, such as definitions of methods, ultra-sensitive (hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT). With the introduction of hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT in clinical practice, the possibility of early diagnosis and exclusion of AMI through the evaluation of the kinetics of the concentration of hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT in the first hours (0-1 hour, 0-2 hours, 0-3 hours) from the moment the patient enters the emergency room. In addition, some of our ideas about the biology of cardiac troponins have changed, and promising new opportunities for their use in medicine have emerged. This manuscript analyzes the key analytical characteristics of hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT detection methods compared to moderately sensitive methods, and reports on new biological data and some new diagnostic possibilities for the use of hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT in modern clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.