Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34962588›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2022

Magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal tibial epiphysis is suitable for statements as to the question of majority: a validation study in forensic age diagnostics.

Daniel Wittschieber, Natia Chitavishvili, Ismini Papageorgiou, Ansgar Malich, Gita Mall, Hans-Joachim Mentzel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel WittschieberInstitute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. daniel.wittschieber@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1344-7488
Natia ChitavishviliSection of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Ismini PapageorgiouInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Ansgar MalichInstitute of Radiology, Südharz Klinikum Nordhausen, Dr.-Robert-Koch-Straße 39, 99734, Nordhausen, Germany.
Gita MallInstitute of Legal Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Hans-Joachim MentzelSection of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DESüdharz Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining majority plays a key role for forensic age diagnostics in living individuals. Recent data suggest that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the proximal tibial epiphysis (PTE) may be a suitable alternative or at least an additional tool to clarify whether an individual has reached majority. However, the reference data situation is still sparse. Hence, the present dual center study retrospectively analyzed routine MRI of the knee in 413 cases (214 males and 199 females) of a Western Caucasian population aged between 12 and 25 years. MRI was performed at 1.5 and 3.0 T clinical scanners using T1- and T2-weighted sequences. The classification system by Vieth et al. (Eur Radiol 2018; 28:3255-3262) was applied for determining the ossification stages of the PTE. Intra-observer agreement was "very good" (κ = 0.931), and inter-observer agreement was "good" (κ = 0.798). Minimum ages above the age of 18 years were observed with the final stage (stage 6) in either sex (20.27 years in males and 18.55 years in females). The results are not in contradiction with the previous data and can be considered a strong and valuable support of the so far existing database. Therefore, the investigation of the PTE using routine MRI (either at 1.5 or 3.0 T) could be taken into consideration for application in forensic age estimation practice in near future.

Indexed as

Age Determination by SkeletonEpiphysesAdolescentAdultChildFemaleForensic AnthropologyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOsteogenesisRetrospective StudiesTibiaYoung AdultAge of majorityForensic age estimationKnee jointRadiation-freeVieth’s classification system

Identifiers

PMID34962588
PMCPMC9005400
OpenAlexW4200015888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.