Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34962586›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2021

In silico molecular docking and dynamic simulation of eugenol compounds against breast cancer.

Hezha O Rasul, Bakhtyar K Aziz, Dlzar D Ghafour, Arif Kivrak

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. An Update on the Therapeutic Anticancer Potential ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Molecular docking appraisal ofIn silico pharmacology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hezha O RasulDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Medicals and Applied Sciences, Charmo University, Peshawa Street, Chamchamal, 46023, Sulaimani, Iraq. hezha.rasul@charmouniversity.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5250-003X
Bakhtyar K AzizDepartment of Nanoscience and Applied Chemistry, College of Medicals and Applied Sciences, Charmo University, Peshawa Street, Chamchamal, 46023, Sulaimani, Iraq.
Dlzar D GhafourDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Science, Komar University of Science and Technology, 46001, Sulaimani, Iraq.
Arif KivrakDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences and Arts, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, 26040, Turkey.
Charmo UniversityEskişehir Osmangazi University · TRKomar University of Science and Technology · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most severe problems, and it is the primary cause of cancer-related death in females worldwide. The adverse effects and therapeutic resistance development are among the most potent clinical issues for potent medications for breast cancer treatment. The eugenol molecules have a significant affinity for breast cancer receptors. The aim of the study has been on the eugenol compounds, which has potent actions on Erα, PR, EGFR, CDK2, mTOR, ERBB2, c-Src, HSP90, and chemokines receptors inhibition. Initially, the drug-likeness property was examined to evaluate the anti-breast cancer activity by applying Lipinski's rule of five on 120 eugenol molecules. Further, structure-based virtual screening was performed via molecular docking, as protein-like interactions play a vital role in drug development. The 3D structure of the receptors has been acquired from the protein data bank and is docked with 87 3D PubChem and ZINC structures of eugenol compounds, and five FDA-approved anti-cancer drugs using AutoDock Vina. Then, the compounds were subjected to three replica molecular dynamic simulations run of 100 ns per system. The results were evaluated using root mean square deviation (RMSD), root mean square fluctuation (RMSF), and protein-ligand interactions to indicate protein-ligand complex stability. The results confirm that Eugenol cinnamaldehyde has the best docking score for breast cancer, followed by Aspirin eugenol ester and 4-Allyl-2-methoxyphenyl cinnamate. From the results obtained from in silico studies, we propose that the selected eugenols can be further investigated and evaluated for further lead optimization and drug development.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationAntineoplastic AgentsBinding SitesBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorEugenolFemaleHumansLigandsMolecular StructureProtein BindingStructure-Activity RelationshipAntineoplastic AgentsEugenolLigandsAutoDock VinaBreast cancerEugenolMolecular dockingMolecular dynamic simulations

Identifiers

PMID34962586
OpenAlexW4200512718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.