Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34962458›Full record

ArticleClinical gerontologist

Preference Importance Ratings among African American and White Nursing Home Residents.

Nytasia M Hicks, Allison R Heid, Katherine M Abbott, Kendall Leser, Kimberly VanHaitsma

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gerontologist. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nytasia M HicksDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.
Allison R HeidIndependent Research Consultant, Ardmore, Pennsylvania, USA.
Katherine M AbbottDepartment of Sociology and Gerontology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6815-2065
Kendall LeserCollege of Education, Health & Society, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, USA.
Kimberly VanHaitsmaThe Polisher Research Institute at the Madlyn and Leonard Abramson Center for Jewish Life, Horsham, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3727-1336

Funding

Assessing preferences for everyday living in the nursing home: reliability and coR21NR011334 · NINR · POLISHER RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI VANHAITSMA, KIMBERLY S · 2011 to 2012
$448k
NINR NIH HHS R21 NR011334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory (PELI-NH) assesses psychosocial preferences of nursing home (NH) residents. This study explored the association of race with importance ratings of self-dominion preferences (i.e., preferences for control).

methodsPELI-NH interviews were conducted with 250 NH residents. Tests of mean differences compared African American (

resultsAfrican Americans were younger and more functionally impaired. After accounting for the effects of gender (female), age (younger), anxiety (greater), and functional impairment (less) with higher reports of importance of self-dominion preferences, race was significant. There were no significant moderating effects.

conclusionsAfrican American residents reported greater importance of self-dominion preferences than Whites. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Cultural sensitivity is critical; it may be more important to provide opportunities for autonomous decision-making for African American than for White residents.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanNursing HomesCognitionFemaleHumansPatient-Centered CareWhitelong-term carePerson-centered carerace

Identifiers

PMID34962458
PMCPMC9237178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.