Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34962357›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2022

Rituximab Impairs B Cell Response But Not T Cell Response to COVID-19 Vaccine in Autoimmune Diseases.

Samuel Bitoun, Julien Henry, Delphine Desjardins, Christelle Vauloup-Fellous, Nicolas Dib, Rakiba Belkhir, Lina Mouna, Candie Joly, Marie Bitu, Bineta Ly and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Vaccination Update and Specific Concerns for RA.Current rheumatology reports · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel BitounHôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, FHU CARE, and Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR 1184, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Auto-immune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases (IMVA-HB/IDMIT), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0891-2269
Julien HenryHôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, FHU CARE, Paris, France.
Delphine DesjardinsUniversité Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR 1184, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Auto-immune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases (IMVA-HB/IDMIT), Paris, France.
Christelle Vauloup-FellousUniversité Paris Saclay, INSERM U1193, AP-HP, Paris, France, and Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France.
Nicolas DibHôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, FHU CARE, Paris, France.
Rakiba BelkhirHôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, FHU CARE, Paris, France.
Lina MounaUniversité Paris Saclay, INSERM U1193, AP-HP, Paris, France, and Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France.
Candie JolyUniversité Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR 1184, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Auto-immune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases (IMVA-HB/IDMIT), Paris, France.
Marie BituUniversité Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR 1184, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Auto-immune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases (IMVA-HB/IDMIT), Paris, France.
Bineta LyUniversité Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR 1184, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Auto-immune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases (IMVA-HB/IDMIT), Paris, France.
Juliette PascaudUniversité Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR 1184, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Auto-immune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases (IMVA-HB/IDMIT), Paris, France.
Raphaèle SerorHôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, FHU CARE, and Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR 1184, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Auto-immune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases (IMVA-HB/IDMIT), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5523-1856
Anne-Marie Roque AfonsoUniversité Paris Saclay, INSERM U1193, AP-HP, Paris, France, and Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France.
Roger Le GrandUniversité Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR 1184, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Auto-immune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases (IMVA-HB/IDMIT), Paris, France.
Xavier MarietteHôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, FHU CARE, and Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR 1184, CEA, Center for Immunology of Viral, Auto-immune, Hematological and Bacterial Diseases (IMVA-HB/IDMIT), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4244-5417
Inserm · FRBicêtre Hospital · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAntibody response to the messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine has been shown to be diminished in rituximab (RTX)-treated patients. We undertook this study to compare humoral and T cell responses between healthy controls, patients with autoimmune diseases treated with RTX, and those treated with other immunosuppressants, all of whom had been vaccinated with 2 doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

methodsWe performed anti-spike IgG and neutralization assays just before and 28 days after the second BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine dose. The specific T cell response was assessed in activated CD4 and CD8 T cells using intracellular flow cytometry staining of cytokines (interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor, and interleukin-2) after stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 spike peptide pools.

resultsA lower proportion of responders with neutralizing antibodies to the vaccine was observed in the RTX group (29%; n = 24) compared to the other immunosuppressants group (80%; n = 35) (P = 0.0001) and the healthy control group (92%; n = 26) (P < 0.0001). No patients treated with RTX in the last 6 months showed a response. Time since last infusion was the main factor influencing humoral response in RTX-treated patients. The functional CD4 and CD8 cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 peptides for each single cytokine or polyfunctionality were not different in the RTX group compared to the other immunosuppressants group or the control group. In RTX-treated patients, the T cell response was not different between patients with and those without a humoral response.

conclusionRTX induced a diminished antibody response to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, but the functional T cell response was not altered compared to healthy controls and autoimmune disease patients treated with other immunosuppressants. Further work is needed to assess the clinical protection granted by a functionally active T cell response in the absence of an anti-spike antibody response.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesCOVID-19Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsRituximabRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunosuppressive AgentsRituximabRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID34962357
PMCPMC9011892
OpenAlexW4200262223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.