Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34962283›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

SAT: a Surrogate-Assisted Two-wave case boosting sampling method, with application to EHR-based association studies.

Xiaokang Liu, Jessica Chubak, Rebecca A Hubbard, Yong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prediction of traumatic hemorrhagic shock using a Multi-scale exogenous variable model (MS-TimeXer-MoE).European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  3. A framework for understanding selection bias in real-world healthcare data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaokang LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6920-5598
Jessica ChubakKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Rebecca A HubbardDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yong ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0835-0788

Funding

Long-term Survivorship in Older Women with Early Stage Breast CancerR01CA093772 · NCI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI SILLIMAN, REBECCA A · 2003 to 2011
$7.5M
IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF MAMMOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATIONU01CA063731 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI BUIST, DIANA SM · 1994 to 2011
$6.7M
Commonly Used Medications and Breast Cancer RecurrenceR01CA120562 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI BOUDREAU, DENISE M · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
Improving confounder control in EHR-based studies of cancer epidemiologyR21CA227613 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HUBBARD, REBECCA · 2019 to 2020
$474k
Algorithms to Identify Second Breast Cancer Events from Electronic DataR21CA143242 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI CHUBAK, JESSICA · 2010 to 2011
$377k
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 1R01AI130460NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093772NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120562NCI NIH HHS R21 CA143242NCI NIH HHS R21 CA227613NCI NIH HHS U01 CA063731Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Project Program Awards ME-2019C3-18315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesElectronic health records (EHRs) enable investigation of the association between phenotypes and risk factors. However, studies solely relying on potentially error-prone EHR-derived phenotypes (ie, surrogates) are subject to bias. Analyses of low prevalence phenotypes may also suffer from poor efficiency. Existing methods typically focus on one of these issues but seldom address both. This study aims to simultaneously address both issues by developing new sampling methods to select an optimal subsample to collect gold standard phenotypes for improving the accuracy of association estimation. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe develop a surrogate-assisted two-wave (SAT) sampling method, where a surrogate-guided sampling (SGS) procedure and a modified optimal subsampling procedure motivated from A-optimality criterion (OSMAC) are employed sequentially, to select a subsample for outcome validation through manual chart review subject to budget constraints. A model is then fitted based on the subsample with the true phenotypes. Simulation studies and an application to an EHR dataset of breast cancer survivors are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of SAT.

resultsWe found that the subsample selected with the proposed method contains informative observations that effectively reduce the mean squared error of the resultant estimator of the association.

conclusionsThe proposed approach can handle the problem brought by the rarity of cases and misclassification of the surrogate in phenotype-absent EHR-based association studies. With a well-behaved surrogate, SAT successfully boosts the case prevalence in the subsample and improves the efficiency of estimation.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsBiasComputer SimulationPhenotypeassociation studyelectronic health recordserror in phenotyperare diseasesampling strategy

Identifiers

PMID34962283
PMCPMC9714591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.