Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34962110›Full record

Trial reportJournal of Korean medical science2021

Assessment of Perioperative Atelectasis Using Lung Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Pneumoperitoneum Surgery in the Trendelenburg Position: Aspects of Differences according to Ventilatory Mode.

Youn Young Lee, Jong In Han, Bo Kyung Kang, Kyungah Jeong, Jong Wha Lee, Dong Yeon Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of Korean medical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Youn Young LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-2436
Jong In HanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8231-7161
Bo Kyung KangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2744-1044
Kyungah JeongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9673-1152
Jong Wha LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3574-191X
Dong Yeon KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-5653
Ewha Womans University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring robotic gynecologic pneumoperitoneum surgery in the Trendelenburg position, aeration loss leads to perioperative atelectasis. Recently developed ventilator mode pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed (PCV-VG) mode could provide adequate ventilation with lower inspiratory pressure compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV); we hypothesized that PCV-VG mode may be beneficial in reducing perioperative atelectasis via low tidal volume (V

methodsPatients scheduled for robotic gynecologic surgery were randomly allocated to the VCV (n = 41) or PCV-VG group (n = 41). LUS, ventilatory, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated at T1 (before induction), T2 (10 minutes after induction in the supine position), T3 (10 minutes after desufflation of CO

resultsEighty patients (40 with PCV-VG and 40 with VCV) were included. Demographic data showed no significant differences between the groups. The total LUS has changed from baseline to T4, 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32, 0.94) to 1.77 (95% CI, 1.42, 2.21) in the VCV group and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.56, 1.16) to 1.43 (95% CI, 1.08, 1.78) in the PCV-VG group (

conclusionUsing a low V

trial registrationClinical Research Information Service Identifier: KCT0006404.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPneumoperitoneumPulmonary AtelectasisFemaleHead-Down TiltHumansLungRespiration, ArtificialUltrasonographyAtelectasisGynecologic AnesthesiaLung UltrasonographyMechanical Ventilation

Identifiers

PMID34962110
PMCPMC8728588
OpenAlexW3216845464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.