Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34962067›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2022

Uncovering the high prevalence of bacterial burden in surgical site wounds with point-of-care fluorescence imaging.

Kylie Sandy-Hodgetts, Charles A Andersen, Omar Al-Jalodi, Laura Serena, Christina Teimouri, Thomas E Serena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Occlusive wound dressings: A greenhouse for bacteria?Journal of infection prevention · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Determination of the Course of Cyan Fluorescence ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kylie Sandy-HodgettsSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Pathology and Laboratory Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6848-2526
Charles A AndersenWound Care Clinic, Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Renton, Washington, USA.
Omar Al-JalodiSerenaGroup Research Foundation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Laura SerenaSerenaGroup Research Foundation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Christina TeimouriBeaver Valley Foot Clinic, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Thomas E SerenaSerenaGroup Research Foundation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1032-3578
SerenaGroup Research Institute · USHeritage Valley Beaver · USMadigan Army Medical Center · USMurdoch University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of bacterial burden within or near surgical wounds is critical to reducing the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI). A distinct lack of reliable methods to identify postoperative bioburden has forced reliance on clinical signs and symptoms of infection (CSS). As a result, infection management has been reactive, rather than proactive. Fluorescence imaging of bacterial burden (FL) is positioned to potentially flip that paradigm. This post hoc analysis evaluated 58 imaged and biopsied surgical site wounds from the multi-centre fluorescence imaging assessment and guidance clinical trial. Diagnostic accuracy measures of CSS and FL were evaluated. A reader study investigated the impact of advanced image interpretation experience on imaging sensitivity. Forty-four of fifty-eight surgical site wounds (75.8%) had bacterial loads >10

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsSurgical Wound InfectionBacterial LoadClinical Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicOptical ImagingPrevalencebacteriadiagnosisfluorescence imagingMolecuLightsurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID34962067
PMCPMC9493216
OpenAlexW4200023338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.