Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961953›Full record

ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2022

High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at intensive care unit admission is associated with nutrition risk in patients with COVID-19.

Paula M Martins, Tatyanne L N Gomes, Emanoelly P Franco, Liana L Vieira, Gustavo D Pimentel

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Why should lymphocytes immune profile matter in sepsis?World journal of critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paula M MartinsClinical Hospital, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Tatyanne L N GomesFaculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Emanoelly P FrancoClinical Hospital, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Liana L VieiraClinical Hospital, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Gustavo D PimentelFaculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2979-9819
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammation plays a crucial role in nutrition status and can be useful in early nutrition risk screening of patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Thus, this study aimed to assess the association between systemic inflammatory markers and nutrition risk tools in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19.

methodsPatients with confirmed COVID-19 and ICU admission were enrolled in a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study. The medians of C-reactive protein (CRP; ≥13.8 mg/dl) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; ≥12.6) upon admission were used to dichotomize patients.

resultsOf the 73 patients, 63% were men; the average age was 56 years, and the median length of hospital stay was 10 (25th: 4; 75th: 17) days. When nutrition risk screening tools were used, 85% were at risk according to Nutritional Risk Screening (≥3 points), whereas 42% had high risk according to the Modified Nutrition Risk in the Critically Ill (mNUTRIC; ≥5 points), and 57% were moderately or severely malnourished according to the Subjective Global Assessment (B or C). Mortality was higher in the group with NLR ≥12.6 than in the group with NLR <12.6, with no difference between CRP groups. A significant association was found only between NLR and mNUTRIC, even when adjusted by sex, age, and body mass index (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06-1.76; P = 0.016), but not between CRP and nutrition risk.

conclusionAlthough the inflammatory marker CRP is the most used in hospital clinical practice, we found that only NLR was associated with nutrition risk (NUTRIC score).

Indexed as

COVID-19Nutritional StatusBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinCritical IllnessCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedNeutrophilsNutrition AssessmentRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinCOVID-19ICUinflammationnutrition status

Identifiers

PMID34961953
PMCPMC9015430
OpenAlexW4200604547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.