Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961899›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022

Experiences with alternative online lectures in medical education in obstetrics and gynecology during the COVID-19 pandemic-possible efficient and student-orientated models for the future?

Maximilian Riedel, Gabriel Eisenkolb, Niklas Amann, Anne Karge, Bastian Meyer, Maria Tensil, Florian Recker, Anna Maria Dobberkau, Fabian Riedel, Bettina Kuschel and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Digital transfer in radiation oncology education for medical students-single-center data and systemic review of the literature.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Digitalization in Medicine: Are German Medical Students Well Prepared for the Future?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maximilian RiedelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany. maximilian.riedel@mri.tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9524-1514
Gabriel EisenkolbDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Niklas AmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Anne KargeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Bastian MeyerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Maria TensilKirinus Clinic Schwabing, Munich, Germany.
Florian ReckerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Bonn University Hospital, Bonn, Germany.
Anna Maria DobberkauDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian RiedelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bettina KuschelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Evelyn KleinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
TUM Klinikum · DEHeidelberg University · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMünchen Klinik Schwabing · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe onset of the COVID-19 pandemic posed an eminent challenge for medical teachers worldwide. Face-to-face lectures and seminars were no longer possible, and alternatives had to be found. E-learning concepts quickly emerged as the only practicable solutions and also offered the opportunity to evaluate whether traditional face-to-face lectures could be translated into an online format, independent of the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe offered an e-learning program consisting of lecture notes, screencasts with audio narration, and online webinars that covered topics normally taught in traditional lectures and seminars. To evaluate the learning behavior and quality of our e-learning program, we drafted a questionnaire that students completed at the end of the 2020 summer semester that had been designed to enable a comparative analysis of the different e-learning modules.

resultsVoluntary participation in the online courses was high. Survey analysis revealed high satisfaction with and a distinctive preference for the format, even under regular, COVID-19-independent conditions. In general, a positive appraisal of e-learning-especially as a substitute for regular lectures-was found. Students also reported higher studying efficiency. Exam results were equal to those of previous semesters.

conclusionBoth acceptance of and satisfaction with our e-learning modules were high, and students displayed increased demand for this kind of e-learning format. We, therefore, conclude that e-learning offerings could serve as reasonable, efficient, student-orientated substitutes for certain medical courses, especially lectures. These curricular adaptations would correlate with the high digitalization seen in students' everyday lives. This correlation may also hold true independent of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, MedicalGynecologyObstetricsHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2StudentsCOVID-19e-learningLearning behaviorLecturesMedical educationRemote learning

Identifiers

PMID34961899
PMCPMC8712207
OpenAlexW4200391491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.