Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961805›Full record

ArticleFood control2022

Behavioral predictors of household food-safety practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Extending the theory of planned behavior.

Raísa Moreira Dardaque Mucinhato, Diogo Thimoteo da Cunha, Simone Crispim Fernandes Barros, Laís Mariano Zanin, Lígia Isoni Auad, Grazielle Castagna Cezimbra Weis, Ana Lúcia de Freitas Saccol, Elke Stedefeldt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Raísa Moreira Dardaque MucinhatoPostgraduate Program in Nutrition - Federal University of São Paulo - UNIFESP, 862 Botucatu St, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil.
Diogo Thimoteo da CunhaMultidisciplinary Laboratory of Food and Health, School of Applied Sciences - State University of Campinas - UNICAMP, 1300 Pedro Zaccaria St, Limeira, SP, 13484-350, Brazil.
Simone Crispim Fernandes BarrosPostgraduate Program in Nutrition - Federal University of São Paulo - UNIFESP, 862 Botucatu St, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil.
Laís Mariano ZaninPostgraduate Program in Nutrition - Federal University of São Paulo - UNIFESP, 862 Botucatu St, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil.
Lígia Isoni AuadDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasília - UnB, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Asa Norte, Brasília, 70910-900, Brazil.
Grazielle Castagna Cezimbra WeisDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Federal University of Santa Maria - UFSM, Roraima Avenue, Camobi, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil.
Ana Lúcia de Freitas SaccolPostgraduate Program in Life Sciences - Franciscana University - UFN. Research Group in Food and Nutritional Security GESAN/CNPq, 1614 Andradas St, Centro, Santa Maria, RS, 97010-030, Brazil.
Elke StedefeldtDepartment of Preventive Medicine - Federal University of São Paulo - UNIFESP. 740, Botucatu St, Fourth Floor, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, SP, 04024-002, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidemiological scenario of COVID-19, social distancing, and business restrictions has increased food preparation and consumption at home. Food mishandling at home can significantly raise the risk of foodborne diseases. This study investigates food-mishandling behavior predictors by applying the extended theory of planned behavior (TPB), with the addition of knowledge and risk perception, to households during the COVID-19 pandemic. One thousand and sixty-eight consumers (n = 1068) in Brazil participated in this study before the COVID-19 vaccination period. Data were collected using an online questionnaire with 40 questions and different anchors; they were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The following original TPB factors positively affected the intention to implement safe food-handling practices: attitude (p < 0.001), perceived behavioral control (p < 0.001), and subjective norms (p < 0.001). More robust effects of attitude and perceived behavioral control on intention were also observed. Although food-safety knowledge did not affect intention (p = 0.30), it positively affected the other TPB factors. Perceived risk positively affected all TPB factors. The results of this study support the usefulness of TPB and its extension, providing evidence that public-health crises can contribute to changes in food-safety-related consumer behavior.

Indexed as

AttitudesConsumersFood safetyKnowledgeRisk perceptionStructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID34961805
PMCPMC8695225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.