Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961800›Full record

ArticleComputers & chemical engineering2022

Ziegler and Nichols meet Kermack and McKendrick: Parsimony in dynamic models for epidemiology.

Michael Nikolaou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers & chemical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael NikolaouChemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department, University of Houston, Houston TX 77204-4004, USA.

Funding

Personalized Antimicrobial Combinations to Combat ResistanceR01AI140287 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI VINCENT H TAM · 2018 to 2026
$5.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI140287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 crisis popularized the importance of mathematical modeling for managing epidemics. A celebrated pertinent model was developed by Kermack and McKendrick about a century ago. A simplified version of that model has long been used and became widely popular recently, even though it has limitations that its originators had clearly articulated and warned against. A basic limitation is that it unrealistically assumes zero time to recovery for most infected individuals, thus underpredicting the peak of infectious individuals in an epidemic by a factor of as much as about 2. One could avoid this limitation by returning to the original comprehensive model, at the cost of higher complexity. To remedy that, we blend Ziegler-Nichols modeling ideas, developed for automatic controller tuning, with Kermack-McKendrick ideas to develop novel model structures that predict infectious peaks accurately yet retain simplicity. We illustrate these model structures with computer simulations on real epidemiological data.

Indexed as

COVID-19EpidemicsFirst-order-plus-time-delaySIRZiegler-Nichols

Identifiers

PMID34961800
PMCPMC8696265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.