Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961584›Full record

ArticleAtencion primaria2021

[Electronic medical record and prescription: risks and benefits detected since its implementation. Safe designing, rollout and use].

Rosa María Añel Rodríguez, Irene García Alfaro, Rafael Bravo Toledo, José Daniel Carballeira Rodríguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atencion primaria, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rosa María Añel RodríguezCentro de Salud Landako, Servicio Vasco de Salud, Durango, País Vasco, España; Grupo de Trabajo de Seguridad del Paciente de semFYC. Electronic address: rosamaria.anelrodriguez@osakidetza.eus.
Irene García AlfaroFarmacia e Inspección, Consejería de Sanidad de Cantabria, España.
Rafael Bravo ToledoGrupo de Trabajo de Seguridad del Paciente de semFYC; Centro de Salud Linneo, Servicio Madrileño de salud, Madrid, España.
José Daniel Carballeira RodríguezFarmacia José Daniel Carballeira Rodríguez, Cantabria, Santander, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New information technologies have transformed the way care is delivered within health services, permeating almost every aspect of health care. As the complexity of the system increases, it becomes more difficult to work optimally without the assistance of new technologies. Although its implementation represents a breakthrough, either because of the advancement involved in the proper use of any technology in health care, or because of the development of specific applications that improve patient safety, other factors such as incorrect design, implementation and poor maintenance, inadequate training, along with overconfidence and dependency, can make technologies compromise patient safety. This article describes the beneficial effects, and those that are not so, of the introduction in our country of the electronic medical record and the electronic prescription on the healthcare quality and safety.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsQuality of Health CareDelivery of Health CareHumansPrescriptionsRisk AssessmentAplicaciones de la informática médicaAtención primaria de saludElectronic medical recordElectronic prescribingHistoria clínica electrónicaInformation systemsMedical informatics applicationsPatient safetyPrescripción electrónicaPrimary Health CareSeguridad del pacienteSistemas de información

Identifiers

PMID34961584
PMCPMC8721342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.