Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961566›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2021

Circulating tumor DNA methylation marker MYO1-G for diagnosis and monitoring of colorectal cancer.

Wu-Hao Lin, Jian Xiao, Zi-Yi Ye, Da-Liang Wei, Xiao-Hui Zhai, Rui-Hua Xu, Zhao-Lei Zeng, Hui-Yan Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wu-Hao Lin *Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Jian Xiao *Department of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun-Yat Sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, People's Republic of China.
Zi-Yi Ye *Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Da-Liang WeiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Hui ZhaiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun-Yat Sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, People's Republic of China.
Rui-Hua XuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Zhao-Lei ZengDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Hui-Yan LuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, 651 Dong Feng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. luohy@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6312-9299
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

national natural science foundation of china 81930065natural science foundation of guangdong province 2014A030312015natural science foundation of guangdong province 2019A1515011109science and technology program of guangdongjiangsu province 2019B020227002science and technology program of guangzhou 201704020228science and technology program of guangzhou 201803040019science and technology program of guangzhou 201904020046science and technology program of guangzhou 202002030208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising diagnostic and prognostic marker for many cancers and has been actively investigated in recent years. Previous studies have already demonstrated the potential use of ctDNA methylation markers in the diagnosis and prognostication of colorectal cancer (CRC). This retrospective study validated the value of methylation biomarker MYO1-G (cg10673833) in CRC diagnosis and disease monitoring using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), a biomarker selected from our previous study due to its highest diagnostic efficiency.

methodsBlood samples of CRC and control samples from tumor-free individuals at two institutions were collected to quantify the methylation ratio using ddPCR. Area under curve (AUC) was calculated after constructing receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for CRC diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated and comparisons of methylation ratio in different groups were performed.

resultsWe collected 673 blood samples from 272 patients diagnosed with stage I-IV CRC and 402 normal control samples. The methylation biomarker discriminated patients with CRC from normal controls with high accuracy (area under curve [AUC] = 0.94) and yielded a sensitivity of 84.3% and specificity of 94.5%. Besides, methylation ratio of MYO1-G was associated with tumor burden and treatment response. The methylation ratio was significantly lower in patients after their radical operation than when compared with those before surgeries (P < 0.001). Methylation ratio was significantly higher in patients with disease progression than those with stable disease (P = 0.002) and those with complete response or partial response (P = 0.009).

conclusionsTogether, our study indicated that this methylation marker can serve as a potential biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring CRC.

Indexed as

AdultArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorChinaCirculating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsDNA MethylationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinor Histocompatibility AntigensMyosinsROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAMinor Histocompatibility AntigensMYO1G protein, humanMyosinsColorectal cancer1CtDNA2Diagnosis4Methylation biomarker3Monitoring5

Identifiers

PMID34961566
PMCPMC8713401
OpenAlexW4200408262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.