Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961550›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of Qiangzhu-qinggan formula as an adjunctive therapy in adult patients with severe influenza: study protocol for a randomized parallel placebo-controlled double-blind multicenter trial.

Lei Qiu, Xian-Wei Wu, Shao-Yan Zhang, Ming Yang, Shun-Xian Zhang, Ji-You Fu, Cui Li, Zhi-Jie Zhang, Pei-Yong Zheng, Zhen-Hui Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lei Qiu *Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.725 South Wanping Road, No.7 building, Xuhui District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xian-Wei Wu *Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.725 South Wanping Road, No.7 building, Xuhui District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shao-Yan ZhangInstitute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.725 South Wanping Road, No.7 building, Xuhui District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Ming YangInstitute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.725 South Wanping Road, No.7 building, Xuhui District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Shun-Xian ZhangInstitute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.725 South Wanping Road, No.7 building, Xuhui District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Ji-You FuInstitute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.725 South Wanping Road, No.7 building, Xuhui District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Cui LiInstitute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.725 South Wanping Road, No.7 building, Xuhui District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zhi-Jie ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, 130 Dongan Road, No.8 building, Xuhui District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Pei-Yong ZhengInstitute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.725 South Wanping Road, No.7 building, Xuhui District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. zpychina@sina.com.
Zhen-Hui LuInstitute of Respiratory Diseases, Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.725 South Wanping Road, No.7 building, Xuhui District, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. Dr_luzh@shutcm.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7172-6621
Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

National Major Science and Technology Projects of China 2017ZX10305501002National Major Science and Technology Projects of China 2018ZX10725-509Shanghai Shen Kang Hospital Development Center SHDC2020CR2006Athe Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai China 20Y21900200the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai China 21S21900200the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai China 21Y21920400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfluenza can fall into three categories according to severity: mild influenza, severe influenza, and critical influenza. Severe influenza can result in critical illness and sometimes death particularly in patients with comorbidities, advanced age, or pregnancy. Neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) are the only antiviral drugs in widespread use for influenza. However, the effectiveness of NAIs against severe influenza is uncertain. New effective drugs or regimens are therefore urgently needed. Qiangzhu-qinggan (QZQG) formula has been found to be effective against influenza virus infection during long-term application in China, which lacks support of evidence-based clinical trial till now. This study is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of QZQG formula as an adjuvant therapy in adult patients with severe influenza.

methodsThis protocol is drawn up in accordance with the SPIRIT guidelines and CONSORT Extension for Chinese herbal medicine formulas. This is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial. Two hundred twenty-eight adults with severe influenza are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to QZQG or placebo for 7 days. All participants need to receive 1 day of screening before randomization, 7 days of intervention, and 21 days of observation after randomization. The primary outcome is the proportion of clinical improvement, defined as the proportion of patients who met the criteria of 3 points or less in the seven-category ordinal scale or 2 points or less in National Early Warning Score 2 within 7 days after randomization. DISCUSSION: This is the first randomized, controlled, parallel, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese herbal formula granules as an adjuvant therapy in adult patients with severe influenza. This study aims to redefine the value of traditional Chinese herbal medicines in the treatment of virus-related respiratory infectious diseases and serves as an example of evidence-based clinical trials of other Chinese herbal medicines.

Indexed as

Drugs, Chinese HerbalInfluenza, HumanAdultAntiviral AgentsCombined Modality TherapyDouble-Blind MethodHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsDrugs, Chinese HerbalAdjunctive therapyQiangzhu-qinggan formulaRandomized controlled trialSevere influenzaTraditional Chinese medicine

Identifiers

PMID34961550
PMCPMC8710932
OpenAlexW4226020352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.