Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961545›Full record

ReviewBMC women's health2021

One-stop clinic for patients with suspected ovarian cancer: results from a retrospective outcome study of the referral pathway.

Ayisha A Ashmore, Chellappah Gnanachandran, Iqra Luqman, Kathryn Horrocks

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayisha A AshmoreDepartment of Gynaecology, Northampton General Hospital, Cliftonville, Northampton, NN1 5BD, UK. a.kibria@doctors.org.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1011-6253
Chellappah GnanachandranDepartment of Gynaecology, Northampton General Hospital, Cliftonville, Northampton, NN1 5BD, UK.
Iqra LuqmanDepartment of Gynaecology, Northampton General Hospital, Cliftonville, Northampton, NN1 5BD, UK.
Kathryn HorrocksDepartment of Gynaecology, Northampton General Hospital, Cliftonville, Northampton, NN1 5BD, UK.
Northampton General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with abdominal pain and bloating frequently have their Ca-125 levels investigated for suspected ovarian cancer and this has led to a significant increase in referrals to the ovarian cancer service. We have conducted this study to help improve the efficiency in which these patients are investigated and to improve future pathways within the referral service.

methodsThis was a retrospective observational outcome study. Data were collected from electronic documents of patients' referrals, assessments, and clinical correspondences over 48 months. The study was conducted in a secondary gynaecology cancer centre with direct referrals from primary care. The pelvic mass clinic was set up to include a consultation and an ultrasound scan with support available for patients if required. All patients included were referred directly from primary care for suspected ovarian cancer with Ca-125 result over a period of 2 years.

results286 were referred from primary care according to the NICE guidelines of '2-week wait for ovarian cancer'. Only 223 patients who had a Ca-125 result reported at the time of their referral were included in the analysis. Out of the 223 patients, 126 patients were discharged with or without a repeat Ca-125 after the initial assessment. 18 patients were diagnosed with cancer following the referral, but only 12 of them had a primary ovarian malignancy. The malignancy rate in women under 50 years of age was 22% (4/18) and 78% (14/18) in women aged 50 or above.

conclusionOne-stop focused gynaecology ultrasound clinics where clinicians may assess patients and perform ultrasound scans for suspected cancer, may be better for managing this patient population due to improved efficiencies in waiting times, same day diagnosis and a reduction in waiting times to first appointment. Secondly, the majority of the patients with Ca-125 of more than 35 U/mL, who were referred through this pathway, did not have cancer. This review queries the future value of using Ca-125 as the basis for referrals from primary care for suspected ovarian malignancy. Further studies are required to assess whether a higher Ca-125 cut off may be used as the basis of referrals for premenopausal women.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsReferral and ConsultationCA-125 AntigenFemaleHumansMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesCA-125 AntigenCancer screeningClinical effectivenessOvarian cancerTumour markersUltrasound scanning

Identifiers

PMID34961545
PMCPMC8712104
OpenAlexW4200331238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.