ArticleCritical care (London, England)2021
Predictors for extubation failure in COVID-19 patients using a machine learning approach.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of high-flow oxygen versus T-piece ventilation strategies during spontaneous breathing trials on weaning failure among patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a randomized controlled trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Trial
- A temporal deep learning algorithm for prediction of extubation failures in critical care patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound : 2025 focused update of the 2012 recommendations.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive Analysis of Extubation Failure in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit in Bloemfontein, South Africa.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Using weak signals to predict spontaneous breathing trial success: a machine learning approach.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting extubation failure in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The prognostic role of cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers in extubation failure in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
- Best clinical model predicting extubation failure: a diagnostic accuracy post hoc analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning to predict extubation success using the spontaneous breathing trial, objective cough measurement, and diaphragmatic contraction velocity: Secondary analysis of the COBRE-US trial.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025Article
- The Value of Ischemic Cardiac Biomarkers to Predict Spontaneous Breathing Trial or Extubation Failure: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Gene expression profiles in COVID-19-associated tracheal stenosis indicate persistent anti-viral response and dysregulated retinol metabolism.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Predict Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Success in Patients with Respiratory Failure, Including Those with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A machine learning approach to predict mortality due to immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Lung Ultrasound Score as a Predictor of Failure to Wean COVID-19 Elderly Patients off Mechanical Ventilation: A Prospective Observational Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2024Observational
- Physical frailty identification using machine learning to explore the 5-item FRAIL scale, Cardiovascular Health Study index, and Study of Osteoporotic Fractures index.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Biomarkers as predictors of mortality in critically ill obese patients with COVID-19 at high altitude.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2023Article
- Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Successful Weaning of Mechanical Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients Requiring Hemodialysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Tracheal complications of mechanical ventilation for COVID-19: a plot twist for survivors.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- The combination of radiomics features and VASARI standard to predict glioma grade.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Explainable machine learning approach to predict extubation in critically ill ventilated patients: a retrospective study in central Taiwan.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
60 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDetermining the optimal timing for extubation can be challenging in the intensive care. In this study, we aim to identify predictors for extubation failure in critically ill patients with COVID-19.
methodsWe used highly granular data from 3464 adult critically ill COVID patients in the multicenter Dutch Data Warehouse, including demographics, clinical observations, medications, fluid balance, laboratory values, vital signs, and data from life support devices. All intubated patients with at least one extubation attempt were eligible for analysis. Transferred patients, patients admitted for less than 24 h, and patients still admitted at the time of data extraction were excluded. Potential predictors were selected by a team of intensive care physicians. The primary and secondary outcomes were extubation without reintubation or death within the next 7 days and within 48 h, respectively. We trained and validated multiple machine learning algorithms using fivefold nested cross-validation. Predictor importance was estimated using Shapley additive explanations, while cutoff values for the relative probability of failed extubation were estimated through partial dependence plots.
resultsA total of 883 patients were included in the model derivation. The reintubation rate was 13.4% within 48 h and 18.9% at day 7, with a mortality rate of 0.6% and 1.0% respectively. The grandient-boost model performed best (area under the curve of 0.70) and was used to calculate predictor importance. Ventilatory characteristics and settings were the most important predictors. More specifically, a controlled mode duration longer than 4 days, a last fraction of inspired oxygen higher than 35%, a mean tidal volume per kg ideal body weight above 8 ml/kg in the day before extubation, and a shorter duration in assisted mode (< 2 days) compared to their median values. Additionally, a higher C-reactive protein and leukocyte count, a lower thrombocyte count, a lower Glasgow coma scale and a lower body mass index compared to their medians were associated with extubation failure.
conclusionThe most important predictors for extubation failure in critically ill COVID-19 patients include ventilatory settings, inflammatory parameters, neurological status, and body mass index. These predictors should therefore be routinely captured in electronic health records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.