Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961515›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2021

Characterization of patients that can continue conservative treatment for adenomyosis.

Chiho Miyagawa, Kosuke Murakami, Takako Tobiume, Takafumi Nonogaki, Noriomi Matsumura

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05751876 (Clinical Experience of Dienogest in Perimenopausal Females With Symptomatic Adenomyosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05751876 completednot on this map

Clinical Experience of Dienogest in Perimenopausal Females With Symptomatic Adenomyosis

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Taiwan University HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled87ConditionsAdenomyosis, Medication AdherenceArmsDienogest
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modern view on the diagnostics and treatment of adenomyosis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chiho MiyagawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2 Ohnohigashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Kosuke MurakamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2 Ohnohigashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan. kmurakami@med.kindai.ac.jp.
Takako TobiumeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Takafumi NonogakiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Noriomi MatsumuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, 377-2 Ohnohigashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Kindai University · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPOsaka Red Cross Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically, hysterectomy has been the radical treatment for adenomyosis. Although, some patients may not want to have their uterus removed, patients often have to no choice but to request hysterectomy during conservative treatment. The factors necessitating these hysterectomies remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine which patients can continue conservative treatment for adenomyosis.

methodsWe selected women diagnosed with adenomyosis and provided with conservative treatment at the Kindai University Hospital and Osaka Red Cross Hospital in Osaka Japan from 2008 to 2017. Age at diagnosis, parity, uterine size, subtype of adenomyosis, type of conservative treatment, and timing of hysterectomy for cases with difficulty continuing conservative treatment were examined retrospectively.

resultsA total of 885 patients were diagnosed with adenomyosis, and 124 started conservative treatment. Conservative treatment was continued in 96 patients (77.4%) and hysterectomy was required in 28 patients (22.6%). The cumulative hysterectomy rate was 32.4%, and all women had hysterectomy within 63 months. In the classification tree, 82% (23/28) of women aged 46 years or younger were able to continue conservative treatment when parity was zero or one. In those with parity two and over, 95% (20/21) of those aged 39 years and older had hysterectomy.

conclusionsPatients who continue conservative treatment for approximately 5 years are more likely to have successful preservation of the uterus. Multiparity and higher age at diagnosis are factors that contribute to hysterectomy after conservative treatment. Parity and age at diagnosis may be stratifying factors in future clinical trials of hormone therapy.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisEndometriosisAdultConservative TreatmentFemaleHumansHysterectomyMiddle AgedPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUterusAdenomyosisHormoneHysterectomyRisk factorsTreatment

Identifiers

PMID34961515
PMCPMC8714452
OpenAlexW4226030525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.