Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961490›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2021

Composition-driven symptom phrase recognition for Chinese medical consultation corpora.

Xuan Gu, Zhengya Sun, Wensheng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xuan GuUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhengya SunUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. zhengya.sun@ia.ac.cn.
Wensheng ZhangUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptom phrase recognition is essential to improve the use of unstructured medical consultation corpora for the development of automated question answering systems. A majority of previous works typically require enough manually annotated training data or as complete a symptom dictionary as possible. However, when applied to real scenarios, they will face a dilemma due to the scarcity of the annotated textual resources and the diversity of the spoken language expressions.

methodsIn this paper, we propose a composition-driven method to recognize the symptom phrases from Chinese medical consultation corpora without any annotations. The basic idea is to directly learn models that capture the composition, i.e., the arrangement of the symptom components (semantic units of words). We introduce an automatic annotation strategy for the standard symptom phrases which are collected from multiple data sources. In particular, we combine the position information and the interaction scores between symptom components to characterize the symptom phrases. Equipped with such models, we are allowed to robustly extract symptom phrases that are not seen before.

resultsWithout any manual annotations, our method achieves strong positive results on symptom phrase recognition tasks. Experiments also show that our method enjoys great potential with access to plenty of corpora.

conclusionsCompositionality offers a feasible solution for extracting information from unstructured free text with scarce labels.

Indexed as

LanguageNatural Language ProcessingChinaHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalReferral and ConsultationComposition drivenMedical consultationNamed entity recognitionSymptom phrase recognition

Identifiers

PMID34961490
PMCPMC8714445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.