Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961266›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Development of SSR Databases Available for Both NGS and Capillary Electrophoresis in Apple, Pear and Tea.

Sogo Nishio, Miyuki Kunihisa, Fumiya Taniguchi, Hiromi Kajiya-Kanegae, Shigeki Moriya, Yukie Takeuchi, Yutaka Sawamura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sogo NishioInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, NARO, Tsukuba 305-8605, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3595-3939
Miyuki KunihisaInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, NARO, Tsukuba 305-8605, Japan.
Fumiya TaniguchiInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, NARO, Tsukuba 305-8605, Japan.
Hiromi Kajiya-KanegaeResearch Center for Agricultural Information Technology, NARO, Tokyo 105-0003, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5719-7559
Shigeki MoriyaInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, NARO, Morioka 020-0123, Japan.
Yukie TakeuchiInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, NARO, Tsukuba 305-8605, Japan.
Yutaka SawamuraInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, NARO, Morioka 020-0123, Japan.
Institute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science · JPResearch Center for Agricultural Information Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing new varieties in fruit and tea breeding programs is very costly and labor-intensive. Thus, establishing a variety discrimination system is important for protecting breeders' rights and producers' profits. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) databases that can be utilized for both next-generation sequencing (SSR-GBS) and polymerase chain reaction-capillary electrophoresis (PCR-CE) would be very useful in variety discrimination. In the present study, SSRs with tri-, tetra- and pentanucleotide repeats were examined in apple, pear and tea. Out of 37 SSRs that showed clear results in PCR-CE, 27 were suitable for SSR-GBS. Among the remaining markers, there was allele dropout for some markers that caused differences between the results of PCR-CE and SSR-GBS. For the selected 27 markers, the alleles detected by SSR-GBS were comparable to those detected by PCR-CE. Furthermore, we developed a computational pipeline for automated genotyping using SSR-GBS by setting a value "α" for each marker, a criterion whether a genotype is homozygous or heterozygous based on allele frequency. The set of 27 markers contains 10, 8 and 9 SSRs for apple, pear and tea, respectively, that are useful for both PCR-CE and SSR-GBS and suitable for automation. The databases help researchers discriminate varieties in various ways depending on sample size, markers and methods.

Indexed as

automationmicrosatellitevariety discrimination

Identifiers

PMID34961266
PMCPMC8703814
OpenAlexW4200588257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.