Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961255›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Two Decades of Desiccation Biology: A Systematic Review of the Best Studied Angiosperm Resurrection Plants.

Shandry M Tebele, Rose A Marks, Jill M Farrant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. A combination of morphological, biochemical and structural responses is required for desiccation tolerance inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Metabolite Profiling of the Resurrection GrassPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Desiccation tolerance in the resurrection plantFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Protein Changes in Shade and SunPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shandry M TebeleDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0452-6937
Rose A MarksDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7102-5959
Jill M FarrantDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1450-7967

Funding

National Research Foundation 98406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resurrection plants have an extraordinary ability to survive extreme water loss but still revive full metabolic activity when rehydrated. These plants are useful models to understand the complex biology of vegetative desiccation tolerance. Despite extensive studies of resurrection plants, many details underlying the mechanisms of desiccation tolerance remain unexplored. To summarize the progress in resurrection plant research and identify unexplored questions, we conducted a systematic review of 15 model angiosperm resurrection plants. This systematic review provides an overview of publication trends on resurrection plants, the geographical distribution of species and studies, and the methodology used. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol we surveyed all publications on resurrection plants from 2000 and 2020. This yielded 185 empirical articles that matched our selection criteria. The most investigated plants were

Indexed as

angiosperm resurrection plantsdesiccation toleranceomics technologiessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34961255
PMCPMC8706221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.