Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961031›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Multi-Criteria Analysis for the Prioritization of Areas for the In Situ Conservation of

Karina Sandibel Vera-Sánchez, Mauricio Parra-Quijano, Raúl Nieto-Ángel, Alejandro F Barrientos-Priego

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karina Sandibel Vera-SánchezPosgrado en Horticultura, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidad Autonoma Chapingo, Texcoco 56230, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0106-4087
Mauricio Parra-QuijanoFacultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá, Bogotá 14490, Colombia.
Raúl Nieto-ÁngelPosgrado en Horticultura, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidad Autonoma Chapingo, Texcoco 56230, Mexico.
Alejandro F Barrientos-PriegoPosgrado en Horticultura, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Universidad Autonoma Chapingo, Texcoco 56230, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complementary ex situ and in situ conservation, including the on-farm alternative, is a highly desired and dynamic strategy that allows the natural evolution of the conserved germplasm. Due to the high costs involved, in addition to the limitations of both economic and human resources, in situ conservation must focus on areas where the greatest benefits are obtained, and the efforts made result in better impacts. Therefore, using spatial multi-criteria analysis and expert knowledge, 22 and 23 criteria were obtained as important for the conservation of wild and cultivated hawthorn, respectively. Criteria weights were calculated by the analytic hierarchy process and expert knowledge. The results showed species richness, phenotypic and ecogeographic diversity, and areas not covered by the official protected areas network were the most important criteria for in situ conservation of wild hawthorn. Prioritized areas were particularly focused in Chiapas, State of Mexico and Morelos. The prioritized areas for the in situ conservation of cultivated hawthorn were mostly defined by criteria such as number of cultivated varieties, number of uses, phenotypic diversity, ecogeographical diversity, and areas with rainfed agriculture. These areas were located mainly in Puebla. From this study, we propose a list of priority areas for the in situ conservation of both cultivated and wild hawthorn.

Indexed as

agrobiodiversityin situ conservationMexican hawthorntejocoteunderutilized crops

Identifiers

PMID34961031
PMCPMC8706608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.