Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34961025›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Effect of ZnO Nanoparticles on Growth and Biochemical Responses of Wheat and Maize.

Akansha Srivastav, Deepak Ganjewala, Rakesh Kumar Singhal, Vishnu D Rajput, Tatiana Minkina, Marina Voloshina, Sudhakar Srivastava, Manoj Shrivastava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Unraveling the potential of zinc oxide nanoparticles on alleviating arsenic toxicity in wheat (Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Akansha SrivastavCentre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.
Deepak GanjewalaAmity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Noida 201303, India.
Rakesh Kumar SinghalAnalytical Chemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India.
Vishnu D RajputAcademy of Biology and Biotechnology, Southern Federal University, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6802-4805
Tatiana MinkinaAcademy of Biology and Biotechnology, Southern Federal University, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3022-0883
Marina VoloshinaAcademy of Biology and Biotechnology, Southern Federal University, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Sudhakar SrivastavaInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6943-8367
Manoj ShrivastavaCentre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1124-6770
Amity University · INSouthern Federal University · RUBanaras Hindu University · INBhabha Atomic Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zinc is an essential element that is also renowned for widespread contamination and toxicity at high concentrations. The present study was carried out to analyze the responses induced by lower, as well as higher, doses of zinc (0-200 mg/L), in the form of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) in wheat and maize, for a period of 21 days. Accumulation of zinc increases with increasing Zn doses in both wheat and maize, with higher doses being in wheat (121 mg/kg in root and 66 mg/kg in shoot) than in maize (95 mg/kg in root and 48 mg/kg in shoot). The activity of alpha-amylase showed increase, while that of dehydrogenase decline, in response to ZnO NPs. The length and biomass of plants and photosynthetic pigments increased slightly upon ZnO NPs supply. Malondialdehyde content showed a progressive increase in root and shoot of both plants. However, in response, antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, guaiacol peroxidase, and catalase) showed increase up to lower concentrations (100 mg/L) of ZnO NPs but decline variably at higher levels (150-200 mg/L) in wheat and maize. The results suggest that lower supply of ZnO NPs (100 mg/L) could be stimulatory to the growth of plants and can be recommended as a Zn fertilizer source for crop production.

Indexed as

antioxidant enzymesdehydrogenaselipid peroxidationzinc accumulationα-amylase

Identifiers

PMID34961025
PMCPMC8708393
OpenAlexW3215087480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.