Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34960944›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

Monomer Elution from Three Resin Composites at Two Different Time Interval Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography-An In-Vitro Study.

Krishnamachari Janani, Kavalipurapu Venkata Teja, Raghu Sandhya, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Ruba K Al-Qaisi, Deepti Shrivastava, Mohammed Odhayd Alnusayri, Zainab Ali Alkhalaf, Mohammed G Sghaireen, Kumar Chandan Srivastava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Krishnamachari JananiSRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Dental College, Chennai 600089, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kavalipurapu Venkata TejaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical & Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0123-8873
Raghu SandhyaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical & Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mohammad Khursheed AlamOrthodontics, Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7131-1752
Ruba K Al-QaisiProsthodontic Dentistry Department, Jordanian Royal Medical Services, Amman 962507, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-6475-6796
Deepti ShrivastavaPeriodontics, Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1073-9920
Mohammed Odhayd AlnusayriProsthodontic Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia.
Zainab Ali AlkhalafProsthodontic Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed G SghaireenProsthodontic Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia.
Kumar Chandan SrivastavaOral Medicine & Radiology, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery & Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5969-6810
Jouf University · SASaveetha University · INKing Hussein Medical Center · JOSRM Institute of Science and Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Esthetics, improved colour stability and ease of contour have made photo-activated resin based restorative materials being widely used in routine dental clinical practice. Perhaps improper and inadequate polymerization of resin based composite material might lead to elution of monomer. Thus, the aim of the current study was to quantify the monomer elution from three resin composites. The intended analysis was made using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) at two different time periods. Three different materials that were investigated in the current study included Swiss Tech resin composite (Group A), Ceram X (Group B) and Beautifil Injectable composite (Group C). Ten cylindrical samples were fabricated in each study group. In 75% wt of ethanol, the samples were ingressed immediately and stored at room temperature. A 0.5 mL of the samples was assessed at pre-defined time intervals at 24 h and 7th day. Later, assessment of the samples was performed with HPLC and the data was analyzed using statistical test. Bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA), Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and Urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) were quantified in the samples. When analyzing the release monomer, it was found that at the end of 24 h Bis-GMA was eluted more in the injectable resin composite whereas, TEGDMA was eluted from Swiss Tech and Ceram X resin composites. At the end of the 7th day it was evident that Bis-GMA was eluted maximum in all the three resin composites. Thus, monomer release was found to be evident among all three resin composites and it is of utmost important to be assessed in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Bis-GMAbulk fill compositesconventional resin compositesdental restorationshigh performance liquid chromatographymonomer releaseresidual monomer

Identifiers

PMID34960944
PMCPMC8704455
OpenAlexW4200016212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.