Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34960688›Full record

ArticleViruses2021

WGS- versus ORF5-Based Typing of PRRSV: A Belgian Case Study.

Frank Vandenbussche, Elisabeth Mathijs, Marylène Tignon, Tamara Vandersmissen, Ann Brigitte Cay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Atypical multidrug-resistant serotype 1Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Current Methods for Recombination Detection in Bacteria.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frank VandenbusscheUnit Exotic Viruses and Particular Diseases, Scientific Directorate of Infectious Diseases in Animals, Sciensano, 1180 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3214-6763
Elisabeth MathijsUnit Enzootic, Vector-Borne and Bee Diseases, Scientific Directorate of Infectious Diseases in Animals, Sciensano, 1180 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6004-605X
Marylène TignonUnit Enzootic, Vector-Borne and Bee Diseases, Scientific Directorate of Infectious Diseases in Animals, Sciensano, 1180 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9781-5289
Tamara VandersmissenAnimal Health Care Flanders (DGZ), 2500 Lier, Belgium.
Ann Brigitte CayUnit Enzootic, Vector-Borne and Bee Diseases, Scientific Directorate of Infectious Diseases in Animals, Sciensano, 1180 Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is the causative agent of one of the most widespread and economically devastating diseases in the swine industry. Typing circulating PRRSV strains by means of sequencing is crucial for developing adequate control strategies. Most genetic studies only target the highly variable open reading frame (ORF) 5, for which an extensive database is available. In this study, we performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on a collection of 124 PRRSV-1 positive serum samples that were collected over a 5-year period (2015-2019) in Belgium. Our results show that (nearly) complete PRRSV genomes can be obtained directly from serum samples with a high success rate. Analysis of the coding regions confirmed the exceptionally high genetic diversity, even among Belgian PRRSV-1 strains. To gain more insight into the added value of WGS, we performed phylogenetic cluster analyses on separate ORF datasets as well as on a single, concatenated dataset (CDS) containing all ORFs. A comparison between the CDS and ORF clustering schemes revealed numerous discrepancies. To explain these differences, we performed a large-scale recombination analysis, which allowed us to identify a large number of potential recombination events that were scattered across the genome. As PRRSV does not contain typical recombination hot-spots, typing PRRSV strains based on a single ORF is not recommended. Although the typing accuracy can be improved by including multiple regions, our results show that the full genetic diversity among PRRSV strains can only be captured by analysing (nearly) complete genomes. Finally, we also identified several vaccine-derived recombinant strains, which once more raises the question of the safety of these vaccines.

Indexed as

Open Reading FramesWhole Genome SequencingAnimalsBelgiumCluster AnalysisDNA, ComplementaryGenetic VariationGenome, ViralMutagenesis, InsertionalPhylogenyPorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusRecombination, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNASequence DeletionSwineDNA, Complementarygenotypingporcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virusrecombinationwhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34960688
PMCPMC8707199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.