ArticleViruses2021
In Silico Identification of Chikungunya Virus B- and T-Cell Epitopes with High Antigenic Potential for Vaccine Development.
Article in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A lipid nanoparticle-based mRNA vaccine elicits immunity against porcine circovirus type 2 in mice.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Identification of immunogenic and cross-reactive chikungunya virus epitopes for CD4Nature communications · 2025Article
- In Silico Discovery of Antigenic-Secreted Proteins to Diagnostic Human Toxocariasis.Acta parasitologica · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing Chikungunya Vaccines: mRNA Breakthroughs With Molecular and Immune Simulations.Bioinformatics and biology insights · 2025Article
- Predicting Immunogenic Epitopes Variation of Envelope 2 Gene Among Chikungunya Virus Clonal Lineages by an In Silico Approach.Viruses · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reverse vaccinology is an outstanding strategy to identify antigens with high potential for vaccine development. Different parameters of five prediction programs were used to assess their sensitivity and specificity to identify B-cell epitopes of Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) strains reported in the IEDB database. The results, based on the use of 15 to 20 mer epitopes and the polyproteins to which they belong, were compared to establish the best parameters to optimize the prediction of antigenic peptides of the Mexican strain CHIKV AJV21562.1. LBtope showed the highest specificity when we used the reported epitopes and polyproteins but the worst sensitivity with polyproteins; ABCpred had similar specificity to LBtope only with the epitopes reported and showed moderate specificity when we used polyproteins for the predictions. Because LBtope was more reliable in predicting true epitopes, it was used as a reference program to predict and select six novel epitopes of the Mexican strain of CHIKV according to prediction frequency, viral genome localization, and non-homology with the human proteome. On the other hand, six bioinformatics programs were used with default parameters to predict T-cell epitopes in the CHIKV strains AJV21562.1 and AJV21561.1. The sequences of the polyproteins were analyzed to predict epitopes present in the more frequent HLA alleles of the Mexican population: DQA1*03011, DQA1*0401, DQA1*0501, DQB1*0201, DQB1*0301, DQB1*0302, and DQB1*0402. Fifteen predicted epitopes in the non-structural and 15 predicted epitopes in the structural polyprotein (9- to 16-mers) with the highest scores of each allele were compared to select epitopes with at least 80% identity. Next, the epitopes predicted with at least two programs were aligned to the human proteome, and 12 sequences without identity with the human proteome were identified as potential antigenic candidates. This strategy would be useful to evaluate vaccine candidates against other viral diseases affecting the countries of the Americas and to increase knowledge about these diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.