Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34960601›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Research Active Posterior Rhinomanometry Tomography Method for Nasal Breathing Determining Violations.

Oleg G Avrunin, Yana V Nosova, Ibrahim Younouss Abdelhamid, Sergii V Pavlov, Natalia O Shushliapina, Natalia A Bouhlal, Ainur Ormanbekova, Aigul Iskakova, Damian Harasim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effectiveness of nonsurgical nasal devices in relieving nasal obstruction.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Oleg G AvruninDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Biomedical Engineering, National University of Radio Electronics, 61166 Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Yana V NosovaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Biomedical Engineering, National University of Radio Electronics, 61166 Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0003-4310-5833
Ibrahim Younouss AbdelhamidDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electronic and Biomedical Engineering, National University of Radio Electronics, 61166 Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0003-2611-2417
Sergii V PavlovDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vinnytsia National Technical University, 21021 Vinnytsia, Ukraine.
Natalia O ShushliapinaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Stomatological Faculty, Kharkiv National Medical University, 61022 Kharkiv, Ukraine.
Natalia A BouhlalAzov Maritime Institute, National University "Odessa Maritime Academy", 65000 Odessa, Ukraine.
Ainur OrmanbekovaFaculty of Information Technology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Al-Farabi Avenue 71, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.
Aigul IskakovaInstitute of Automation and Information Technologies, Satbayev University, Satpaev Street 22, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.
Damian HarasimFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Institute of Electronic and Information Technologies, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9859-5879
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University · UAAl-Farabi Kazakh National University · KZKharkiv National Medical University · UALublin University of Technology · PLOdessa National Maritime University · UASatbayev University · KZVinnytsia National Technical University · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study analyzes the existing methods for studying nasal breathing. The aspects of verifying the results of rhinomanometric diagnostics according to the data of spiral computed tomography are considered, and the methodological features of dynamic posterior active rhinomanometry and the main indicators of respiration are also analyzed. The possibilities of testing respiratory olfactory disorders are considered, the analysis of errors in rhinomanometric measurements is carried out. In the conclusions, practical recommendations are given that have been developed for the design and operation of tools for functional diagnostics of nasal breathing disorders. It is advisable, according to the data of dynamic rhinomanometry, to assess the functioning of the nasal valve by the shape of the air flow rate signals during forced breathing and the structures of the soft palate by the residual nasopharyngeal pressure drop. It is imperative to take into account not only the maximum coefficient of aerodynamic nose drag, but also the values of the pressure drop and air flow rate in the area of transition to the turbulent quadratic flow regime. From the point of view of the physiology of the nasal response, it is necessary to look at the dynamic change to the current mode, given the hour of the forced response, so that it will ensure the maximum possible acidity in the legend. When planning functional rhinosurgical operations, it is necessary to apply the calculation method using computed tomography, which makes it possible to predict the functional result of surgery.

Indexed as

NoseRespirationRespiratory RateRhinomanometryTomography, X-Ray Computedchronic respiratory diseaseCThuman healthnasal airwayspublic healthrhinomanometry

Identifiers

PMID34960601
PMCPMC8708127
OpenAlexW4200020926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.