ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
A Deep Autoencoder-Based Convolution Neural Network Framework for Bearing Fault Classification in Induction Motors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aircraft Sensor Fault Diagnosis Based on GraphSage and Attention Mechanism.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Industrial Fault Detection Employing Meta Ensemble Model Based on Contact Sensor Ultrasonic Signal.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Disentangled VAE-BiLSTM Model for Heart Rate Anomaly Detection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Classification Framework of the Bearing Faults of an Induction Motor Using Wavelet Scattering Transform-Based Features.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Fuzzy Reasoning Numerical Spiking Neural P Systems for Induction Motor Fault Diagnosis.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A Bearing Fault Classification Framework Based on Image Encoding Techniques and a Convolutional Neural Network under Different Operating Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fault diagnosis and classification for machines are integral to condition monitoring in the industrial sector. However, in recent times, as sensor technology and artificial intelligence have developed, data-driven fault diagnosis and classification have been more widely investigated. The data-driven approach requires good-quality features to attain good fault classification accuracy, yet domain expertise and a fair amount of labeled data are important for better features. This paper proposes a deep auto-encoder (DAE) and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based bearing fault classification model using motor current signals of an induction motor (IM). Motor current signals can be easily and non-invasively collected from the motor. However, the current signal collected from industrial sources is highly contaminated with noise; feature calculation thus becomes very challenging. The DAE is utilized for estimating the nonlinear function of the system with the normal state data, and later, the residual signal is obtained. The subsequent CNN model then successfully classified the types of faults from the residual signals. Our proposed semi-supervised approach achieved very high classification accuracy (more than 99%). The inclusion of DAE was found to not only improve the accuracy significantly but also to be potentially useful when the amount of labeled data is small. The experimental outcomes are compared with some existing works on the same dataset, and the performance of this proposed combined approach is found to be comparable with them. In terms of the classification accuracy and other evaluation parameters, the overall method can be considered as an effective approach for bearing fault classification using the motor current signal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.