Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34960481›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Recognizing Full-Body Exercise Execution Errors Using the Teslasuit.

Polona Caserman, Clemens Krug, Stefan Göbel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Polona CasermanResearch Group Serious Games, Technical University of Darmstadt, Rundeturmstrasse 10, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3252-4533
Clemens KrugResearch Group Serious Games, Technical University of Darmstadt, Rundeturmstrasse 10, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.
Stefan GöbelResearch Group Serious Games, Technical University of Darmstadt, Rundeturmstrasse 10, 64283 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3651-8744

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regular physical exercise is essential for overall health; however, it is also crucial to mitigate the probability of injuries due to incorrect exercise executions. Existing health or fitness applications often neglect accurate full-body motion recognition and focus on a single body part. Furthermore, they often detect only specific errors or provide feedback first after the execution. This lack raises the necessity for the automated detection of full-body execution errors in real-time to assist users in correcting motor skills. To address this challenge, we propose a method for movement assessment using a full-body haptic motion capture suit. We train probabilistic movement models using the data of 10 inertial sensors to detect exercise execution errors. Additionally, we provide haptic feedback, employing transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation immediately, as soon as an error occurs, to correct the movements. The results based on a dataset collected from 15 subjects show that our approach can detect severe movement execution errors directly during the workout and provide haptic feedback at respective body locations. These results suggest that a haptic full-body motion capture suit, such as the Teslasuit, is promising for movement assessment and can give appropriate haptic feedback to the users so that they can improve their movements.

Indexed as

ExerciseMovementFeedbackHumansMotionMotor Skillsfull-body motion capturehaptic feedbackhuman exercise assessmentimitation learninginertial measurement unitstranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34960481
PMCPMC8703589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.