Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34960479›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

WildGait: Learning Gait Representations from Raw Surveillance Streams.

Adrian Cosma, Ion Emilian Radoi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adrian CosmaFaculty of Automatic Control and Computer Science, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0307-2520
Ion Emilian RadoiFaculty of Automatic Control and Computer Science, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1177-5288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of gait for person identification has important advantages such as being non-invasive, unobtrusive, not requiring cooperation and being less likely to be obscured compared to other biometrics. Existing methods for gait recognition require cooperative gait scenarios, in which a single person is walking multiple times in a straight line in front of a camera. We address the challenges of real-world scenarios in which camera feeds capture multiple people, who in most cases pass in front of the camera only once. We address privacy concerns by using only motion information of walking individuals, with no identifiable appearance-based information. As such, we propose a self-supervised learning framework, WildGait, which consists of pre-training a Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Network on a large number of automatically annotated skeleton sequences obtained from raw, real-world surveillance streams to learn useful gait signatures. We collected and compiled the largest pretraining dataset to date of anonymized walking skeletons called Uncooperative Wild Gait, containing over 38k tracklets of anonymized walking 2D skeletons. We make the dataset available to the research community. Our results surpass the current state-of-the-art pose-based gait recognition solutions. Our proposed method is reliable in training gait recognition methods in unconstrained environments, especially in settings with scarce amounts of annotated data.

Indexed as

GaitWalkingBiometryHumansMotiongait recognitiongraph neural networkspose estimationself-supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID34960479
PMCPMC8705742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.