Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34960295›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Combining Implicit and Explicit Feature Extraction for Eye Tracking: Attention Classification Using a Heterogeneous Input.

Lisa-Marie Vortmann, Felix Putze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lisa-Marie VortmannCognitive Systems Lab, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0601-0950
Felix PutzeCognitive Systems Lab, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5203-8797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical measurements of eye movement-specific properties, such as fixations, saccades, blinks, or pupil dilation, are frequently utilized as input features for machine learning algorithms applied to eye tracking recordings. These characteristics are intended to be interpretable aspects of eye gazing behavior. However, prior research has demonstrated that when trained on implicit representations of raw eye tracking data, neural networks outperform these traditional techniques. To leverage the strengths and information of both feature sets, we integrated implicit and explicit eye tracking features in one classification approach in this work. A neural network was adapted to process the heterogeneous input and predict the internally and externally directed attention of 154 participants. We compared the accuracies reached by the implicit and combined features for different window lengths and evaluated the approaches in terms of person- and task-independence. The results indicate that combining implicit and explicit feature extraction techniques for eye tracking data improves classification results for attentional state detection significantly. The attentional state was correctly classified during new tasks with an accuracy better than chance, and person-independent classification even outperformed person-dependently trained classifiers for some settings. For future experiments and applications that require eye tracking data classification, we suggest to consider implicit data representation in addition to interpretable explicit features.

Indexed as

AttentionEye-Tracking TechnologyEye MovementsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSaccadesattentionconvolutional neural networkeye trackingfeature extractionGramian angular fieldsheterogeneous feature setsimplicit feature learningMarkov transition fields

Identifiers

PMID34960295
PMCPMC8707750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.