Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34960269›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Does the Score on the MRC Strength Scale Reflect Instrumented Measures of Maximal Torque and Muscle Activity in Post-Stroke Survivors?

Pawel Kiper, Daniele Rimini, Deborah Falla, Alfonc Baba, Sebastian Rutkowski, Lorenza Maistrello, Andrea Turolla

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Decompensation of degenerative lumbar stenosis: do patients need immediate surgery?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Pawel KiperPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Azienda ULSS 3 Serenissima, 30126 Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5990-5734
Daniele RiminiMedical Physics Department-Clinical Engineering, Salford Care Organisation, Salford M6 8HD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7170-7052
Deborah FallaCentre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1689-6190
Alfonc BabaRehabilitation Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università Padova, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Sebastian RutkowskiFaculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Opole University of Technology, 45-758 Opole, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8504-0129
Lorenza MaistrelloLaboratory of Neurorehabilitation Technologies, San Camillo IRCCS, 30126 Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2955-4376
Andrea TurollaLaboratory of Neurorehabilitation Technologies, San Camillo IRCCS, 30126 Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1609-8060
IRCCS San Camillo Hospital · ITAULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana · ITOpole University of Technology · PLUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains unknown whether variation of scores on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale for muscle strength is associated with operator-independent techniques: dynamometry and surface electromyography (sEMG). This study aimed to evaluate whether the scores of the MRC strength scale are associated with instrumented measures of torque and muscle activity in post-stroke survivors with severe hemiparesis both before and after an intervention. Patients affected by a first ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 6 months before enrollment and with complete paresis were included in the study. The pre- and post-treatment assessments included the MRC strength scale, sEMG, and dynamometry assessment of the triceps brachii (TB) and biceps brachii (BB) as measures of maximal elbow extension and flexion torque, respectively. Proprioceptive-based training was used as a treatment model, which consisted of multidirectional exercises with verbal feedback. Each treatment session lasted 1 h/day, 5 days a week for a total 15 sessions. Nineteen individuals with stroke participated in the study. A significant correlation between outcome measures for the BB (MRC and sEMG

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthElectromyographyHumansRange of Motion, ArticularSurvivorsTorquedynamometerEMGMRCneurorehabilitationstrengthstroke

Identifiers

PMID34960269
PMCPMC8708806
OpenAlexW4200480256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.