Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34960262›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Rotating Machinery Fault Diagnosis Method by Combining Time-Frequency Domain Features and CNN Knowledge Transfer.

Lihao Ye, Xue Ma, Chenglin Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lihao YeSchool of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Xue MaSchool of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Chenglin WenSchool of Automation, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, China.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB1313301) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61933013, 61733015 and 61733009 2020YFB1313301,61933013, 61733015 and 61733009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aiming at the problem of fault diagnosis when there are only a few labeled samples in the large amount of data collected during the operation of rotating machinery, this paper proposes a fault diagnosis method based on knowledge transfer in deep learning. First, we describe the data collected during the operation as a two-dimensional image with both time and frequency-domain characteristics. Second, we transform the trained source domain model into a shallow model suitable for small samples in the target domain, and we train the shallow model with small samples with labels. Third, we input a large number of unlabeled samples into the shallow model, and the output result of the system is regarded as the label of the input sample. Fourth, we combine the original data and the data annotated by the shallow model to train the new deep CNN fault diagnosis model so as to realize the migration of knowledge from the expert system to the deep CNN. The newly built deep CNN model is used for the online fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. The FFCNN-SVM shallow model tagger method proposed in this paper compares the fault diagnosis results with other transfer learning methods at this stage, and its correct rate has been greatly improved. This method provides new ideas for future fault diagnosis under small samples.

Indexed as

deep CNNfault diagnosisknowledge transferringmodel transferringtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID34960262
PMCPMC8709426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.