Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34960241›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Austria's Digital Vaccination Registry: Stakeholder Views and Implications for Governance.

Katharina T Paul, Anna Janny, Katharina Riesinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katharina T PaulDepartment of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3851-8951
Anna JannyDepartment of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria.
Katharina RiesingerDepartment of Political Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF V 561FWF Austrian Science Fund V561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we explore the recent setup of a digital vaccination record in Austria. Working from a social-scientific perspective, we find that the introduction of the electronic vaccination pass was substantially accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Our interviews with key stakeholders (

Indexed as

AustriaCOVID-19datadigitalizationhealthimmunizationpolicyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID34960241
PMCPMC8706289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.