Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34960198›Full record

ReviewVaccines2021

Does Influenza Vaccination during Pregnancy Have Effects on Non-Influenza Infectious Morbidity? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Katrine Pedersbæk Hansen, Christine Stabell Benn, Thomas Aamand, Martin Buus, Isaquel da Silva, Peter Aaby, Ane Bærent Fisker, Sanne Marie Thysen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association Between COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy and Safety Among Infants.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katrine Pedersbæk HansenBandim Health Project, OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christine Stabell BennBandim Health Project, OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thomas AamandBandim Health Project, OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Martin BuusBandim Health Project, OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Isaquel da SilvaBandim Health Project, Indepth Network, Apartado 861, Bissau 1004, Guinea-Bissau.
Peter AabyBandim Health Project, OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ane Bærent FiskerBandim Health Project, OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8521-0992
Sanne Marie ThysenBandim Health Project, OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, Odense University Hospital/University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bandim Health Project · GWUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recommendation to provide inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) to pregnant women is based on observed protection against influenza-related morbidity in mother and infant. Non-live vaccines may have non-specific effects (NSEs), increasing the risk of non-targeted infections in females. We reviewed the evidence from available randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of IIV to pregnant women, to assess whether IIV may have NSEs. Four RCTs, all conducted in low- and middle-income settings, were identified. We extracted information on all-cause and infectious mortality and adverse events in women and their infants. We conducted meta-analyses providing risk ratios (RR). The meta-analysis for maternal all-cause mortality provided a RR of 1.48 (95% CI = 0.52-4.16). The estimates for miscarriage/stillbirth and infant all-cause mortality up to 6 months of age were 1.06 (0.78-1.44) and 1.11 (0.87-1.41), respectively. IIV was associated with a higher risk of non-influenza infectious adverse events, with meta-estimates of 2.01 (1.15-3.50) in women and 1.36 (1.12-1.67) in infants up to 6 months of age. Thus, following a pattern seen for other non-live vaccines, IIV was associated with a higher risk of non-influenza infectious adverse events. To ensure that scarce resources are used well, and no harm is inflicted, further RCTs are warranted.

Indexed as

all-cause mortalityimmune systeminfluenza vaccinenon-specific effectspregnancyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID34960198
PMCPMC8707251
OpenAlexW4200516756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.