Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34960163›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

Oral Administration of Coronavirus Spike Protein Provides Protection to Newborn Pigs When Challenged with PEDV.

Magdalena Maj, Gina M Fake, John H Walker, Ryan Saltzman, John A Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Antiviral Potential of Plants against COVID-19 during Outbreaks-An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Immune Responses Induced by RecombinantVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Magdalena MajDepartment of Biological Sciences, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3511-3788
Gina M FakeApplied Biotechnology Institute, Cal Poly Tech Park, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.
John H WalkerDepartment of Statistics, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.
Ryan SaltzmanVeterinary Resources Inc., Ames, IA 50010, USA.
John A HowardApplied Biotechnology Institute, Cal Poly Tech Park, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.

Funding

Agricultural Research Institute CSU 58913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate whether oral administration of maize-produced S antigen can provide passive immunity to piglets against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), 16 pregnant sows were randomly assigned to one of four treatments: (1) injection of PEDV vaccine (INJ), (2) maize grain without S protein (CON), (3) maize grain containing low dose of S antigen (LOV) and (4) maize grain containing a high dose of S antigen (HOV). Vaccines were administered on days 57, 85 and 110 of gestation. Sows' serum and colostrum were collected at farrowing and milk on day 6 post-challenge to quantify neutralizing antibodies (NABs) and cytokines. Piglets were challenged with PEDV 3-5 d after farrowing, and severity of disease and mortality assessed on day 11 post-challenge. Disease severity was lower in LOV and INJ compared with HOV and CON, whereas the survival rate increased in piglets from LOV sows compared with HOV and CON (

Indexed as

cytokinesGM-CSFmaizeoral deliverypassive immunityPEDVplant-produced vaccinesspike protein

Identifiers

PMID34960163
PMCPMC8706244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.