Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34960162›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

"Until I Know It's Safe for Me": The Role of Timing in COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making and Vaccine Hesitancy.

Eric B Kennedy, Jean-François Daoust, Jenna Vikse, Vivian Nelson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric B KennedyDisaster and Emergency Management, School of Administrative Studies, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0056-1521
Jean-François DaoustPolitics & International Relations, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Scotland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2736-7430
Jenna VikseDiscourse, Science, Publics Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Vivian NelsonDiscourse, Science, Publics Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
University of Guelph · CAUniversity of Edinburgh · GBYork University · CA

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council 1006-2019-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing the COVID-19 pandemic-and other communicable diseases-involves broad societal uptake of vaccines. As has been demonstrated, however, vaccine uptake is often uneven and incomplete across populations. This is a substantial challenge that must be addressed by public health efforts. To this point, significant research has focused on demographic and attitudinal correlates with vaccine hesitancy to understand uptake patterns. In this study, however, we advance understandings of individual decision-making processes involved in vaccine uptake through a mixed-methods investigation of the role of

Indexed as

COVID-19public healthrisk aversiontimingvaccinevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID34960162
PMCPMC8705559
OpenAlexW3214958019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.